I love your positivity, we need more people like you on board.
Alberta is asking for more input
- Thread starter TSE JR
- Start date
I love your positivity, we need more people like you on board.
Done, but not holding my breath. With the liberal media and the general population of sheep that lap up whatever CTV or Global tells them, this country is doomed. I shed a tear today for my elders that shed blood to make this country what it was 40 years ago. Liberal policies have never built anything solid, never created a foundation for any real future, and panders to weak people. God help us.
I have no legal expertise, but I suspect that a CFO has certain liberties they can take. For instance, our laws as outlined include the following justifications for a license to carry:
Protection of Life
2 For the purpose of section 20 of the Act, the circumstances in which an individual needs restricted firearms or prohibited handguns to protect the life of that individual or of other individuals are where
(a) the life of that individual, or other individuals, is in imminent danger from one or more other individuals;
(b) police protection is not sufficient in the circumstances; and
(c) the possession of a restricted firearm or prohibited handgun can reasonably be justified for protecting the individual or other individuals from death or grievous bodily harm.
Presumably, a CFO can interpret "Police protection is not sufficient in the circumstances" or "reasonable be justified for protecting the individual or other individuals from death or grievous bodily harm" in a way that would allow for more carry permits to be issues. However, there are likely far more qualified people than I who can speak to this.
