There were a few discussions when this first showed up on the radar. No one really seemed to have handled them. There is a youtube vid of someone of a young-ish nature shooting one and flinching like crazy. The video/pictures tell me a few things.
#1. The stock is the bare minimum amount of stock
And not appropriate for proper repeatable shooting. The shooters head is floating, with no appropriate cheek weld area. If it were me I would have a different stock made up right away, or modify that one to suit.
#2 Recoil seems to be managed well enough. I'm not sure if shooter experience would aid in minimising this more..
It seems the rifle has been built more for a lower cost point, cutting corners at the junctions that would make it more attractive to me (again, the stock)
The video does not show the rifle being re-loaded but I believe it is a "shell holder" style action, and it has been *implied* (not trying to start a flame war, memory is just fuzzy) to be a knockoff of another rifle built by others out there.
The cost is attractive for an entry level 50, however I feel with the shortcomings of the stock and dealing with them; the price point would wind up similar to other better known entry level 50's.
.