Anyone who's received a new cert for their Krinker Plinker...

sxyglock17

sxyglock17

BANNED
BANNED
BANNED
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
20   0   0
Location
Oshawa
Anyone who has recently received a new cert for their Krinker that use to say non-restricted, but now says restricted (and you weren't intending to make a restricted one), please PM me asap.

Have your cert# handy.

Thanks!

-Jamie M.
 
Because your barrel change is only valid for 30 days so says the CFC/RCMP, so people got the krinkers verified so their evil reg cert said 8". They didn't want to be caught with the reg cert that said over 18" and people thought they hacksawd the barrel. The CFC has revoked a few certs, and also changed the status to a few to restricted, and I plan on challenging it in a court case, so I need someone who had their changed.

-Jamie M.
 
I don't have a Krinker-Plinker, I hope I'll be able to buy one someday.

Sxyglock already has a hero status on CGN (for me, anyway).
I wish him all the luck he needs in this case and in the future ones.



This is SICK!!!!:puke:
WTF do they think?
Is this CFC so uncontrollable, like a wild animal?
Did they put that wendi in charge?
WTF is going on with these antis in CFC positions?
 
RobertMcC said:
What If you never even bothered to get it verified?
Click to expand...
The CFC and RCMP have said that if you leave the barrel on there longer then 30 days, you're in trouble. There has been a debate/clarification that "if the barrel change does not change the 'classification' of the firearm, then verification is not required.", but, who knows.

Now, the "welded folding stock" is what is at the heart of the classification change.

The CFC says "if it was EVER DESIGNED to fold, then IT IS a FOLDING stock, even if it currently CAN'T FOLD!?", WTF!? Nowhere in the firearms act/criminal code does it say the word "originally designed to fold" when it talkes about making a prohib/resitrcted firearm. It just says "designed to fold when installed on rifle, blah blah". But, if it's welded first, then you can't say it's designed to fold when you installed it can you??

Crazyness.

-Jamie M.
 
sxyglock17 said:
The CFC and RCMP have said that if you leave the barrel on there longer then 30 days, you're in trouble. There has been a debate/clarification that "if the barrel change does not change the 'classification' of the firearm, then verification is not required.", but, who knows.

Now, the "welded folding stock" is what is at the heart of the classification change.

The CFC says "if it was EVER DESIGNED to fold, then IT IS a FOLDING stock, even if it currently CAN'T FOLD!?", WTF!? Nowhere in the firearms act/criminal code does it say the word "originally designed to fold" when it talkes about making a prohib/resitrcted firearm. It just says "designed to fold when installed on rifle, blah blah". But, if it's welded first, then you can't say it's designed to fold when you installed it can you??

Crazyness.

-Jamie M.
Click to expand...

Wasn't it if it didn't change your OAL it was okay?
 
Last edited:
Nope, it was as long as it doesn't change the classification of the firearm "i.e. non-restricted to restricted" or something like that.

The reason why AR15's with 10 different barrels is OK, is because it's already restricted. Changing barrels can't make it non-restricted, so no need to notify them.

Now with the krinker, if changing the barrel "might" change the classification, when I guess you better have it verified. As far as going back to a "non-restricted" barrel after it's been classed restricted?? Hmmmm.
 
sxyglock17 said:
Nope, it was as long as it doesn't change the classification of the firearm "i.e. non-restricted to restricted" or something like that.

The reason why AR15's with 10 different barrels is OK, is because it's already restricted. Changing barrels can't make it non-restricted, so no need to notify them.

Now with the krinker, if changing the barrel "might" change the classification, when I guess you better have it verified. As far as going back to a "non-restricted" barrel after it's been classed restricted?? Hmmmm.
Click to expand...

Must have changed since I installed the kit. Because I wasn't aware you had to have them verified. Everybody said barrel length does not matter for a 22LR as long as OAL was more then 26"
 
You only have to have them verified if the barrel makes it restricted. Now the people who were welding their folders were under the impression that they would remain non-restricted. But the CFC is now saying that welding a folder doesn't make it count towards OAL, so now the people who think they have non-restricted Krinkers, are resitrcted. The folder with the 16" barrel and/or fake silencer are still non-restricted. We're just talking about the 8" Krinkers with the welded stock.

So, if yours is 16" barrel, no probs. If it's 8", and the stock was "originally designed to fold", those are the ones in hot water.

-Jamie M.
 
sxyglock17 said:
You only have to have them verified if the barrel makes it restricted. Now the people who were welding their folders were under the impression that they would remain non-restricted. But the CFC is now saying that welding a folder doesn't make it count towards OAL, so now the people who think they have non-restricted Krinkers, are resitrcted. The folder with the 16" barrel and/or fake silencer are still non-restricted. We're just talking about the 8" Krinkers with the welded stock.

So, if yours is 16" barrel, no probs. If it's 8", and the stock was "originally designed to fold", those are the ones in hot water.

-Jamie M.
Click to expand...

I welded mine before I put it on...Welded and screwed. Mines 8"

If the stock does not add to overall length, Then there be no way a 16" be non restricted either. It still needs 2 1/4" to remain 26".
 
Last edited:
oh great, what a bunch of crap.

people should've welded the stock and then stfu about it, don't volunteer info.

so i imagine replacing the stock with wood or a non-folder and you escape the BS?


geez,i guess i'm a criminal now:runaway::rolleyes:
 
if you have the 16" "silenced" barrel you're non restricted and your folding stock is fine though, right?


I really wanna get a krinker now and put some wood AK furniture on it (with the upper foregrip being from an SKS that is)
 
I think such a ruling would have far reaching consequences - not necessarily unfavourable. So, hypothetically, under that logic, I could take a semi-automatic and convert it to full-auto and claim its OK because it was designed for semi-automatic fire. All deactivated firearms/prohibs will become firearms/prohibs again because thats what they were designed for? This scheme was not designed to be illegal? Pfft!
 
WTF? I just got one from the EE with the specific reasoning that it was UNRESTRICTED. Now i'm hearing this? WTF? At this rate, within a couple of years, the only unrestricted guns will be 60" Flintlocks.

What if i just bought a 20" barrel for the krinker and put that on it? or can you only put a Krinker Plinker barrel on a Krinker kit?
 
Devilito said:
What if i just bought a 20" barrel for the krinker and put that on it? or can you only put a Krinker Plinker barrel on a Krinker kit?
Click to expand...

Well we don't have the SOURCE FACTS from SXYGLOCK17 yet. The krinker is a stock and a barrel for a 10/22. The rifle is a 10/22 and always will be, any barrel made for a 10/22 will work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom