AR15 Reloading Dies

Note also that I know of no manufacturer that market product that do not sell..

However lots of companies are selling solutions to nonexistant problems because people want something new and shiney. Anyone want to buy a piston driven AR because those DI ones are soooooo unreliable.

I guess when I start having problems I will look for a solution, until then I will keep using my FL dies.
 
Just my 2 cents. I have RCBS, Redding & Lee dies for .223.
Seems the cheaper Lee dies have worked the best in my Ar's.
I crimp them also.
 
This is a GUESS so don't rely on this information.

But I am GUESSING that a FL .223 die, run in to a 5.56 chamber, would be similar to running a small base die.

In fact looking at the dimensions for chamber reamers, I notice that Clymer gives 5.56 base dimension as 0.3816", and .223 as 0.3794".

PTG Match .223 has a base dimension of 0.3779".

However, JGS and PTG 5.56 reamers are 0.3804" and 0.3803" respectively.

PTG's .223 reamer has a base dimension of 0.3804"...only one ten-thou larger than their 5.56 reamer!

But in general it appears that a 5.56 chamber will have a base dimension approximately 2 thou larger than a .223 chamber.

Therefore, I believe my guess is correct...running a full-length .223 die on a gun with an actual 5.56 chamber, not just a Bushmaster "maybe 5.56, maybe .223" chamber, should produce a pretty reliable base sizing.

But I do not reload for ARs and this is just a guess based on the base!

Looking at the dimensions of the various reamers nothing is jumping out at me to say there is any reason a .223 die should produce a cartridge with any difficulty chambering with any other dimension, but I am just scanning it. Base to shoulder dimension seems fine, shoulder angle seems fine...I believe there are no issues.

I have loaded some rounds with my Dillon FL Carbide sizing die set in .223 Rem. They ran perfectly in my 5.56 chambered LMT barrel. Not sure if the chamber had anything to do with this or it was the dies.
 
Back
Top Bottom