Barnes 175gr LRX vs Moose

bcsteve

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
135   0   0
Location
BC
Last year I snagged a stainless Winchester 70 in .300 WSM for a price I couldn't pass. I already had my custom stainless Ruger MKII in .35 Whelen as my moose rifle but I figured I could justify the .300 WSM as my long range big rifle;). I was trying to decide between the 168gr and 180gr TTSX just when the new Barnes LRX came out. A 175gr would be a good compromise and the LRX (long range X) would be perfect since this was going to be for longer range.

Just like last year, for this year moose hunt I brought out both the Whelen and the .300 WSM. Once we hit the gravel road, I reached for the gun case to get out a rifle just in case we would see something on the way up and it just happened that it was the .300 WSM that was in easy reach.

It was new area where neither of us had been before and we had a group cow/calf draw. The first day was more driving around exploring than hunting. At 5pm I spotted a cow and a calf on the other side of a small creek and just like that, our moose hunt was over before it had even started. I shot the big cow and my buddy the calf. Range was about 75yds , cow quartering away, she took one step and tipped over. Not much of a long range test!

During butchering, I found the bullet and two petals in the front opposite shoulder. Recovered weight with the two petals: 146.7gr.

Observations: - The lungs were a pudle of goo in the chest cavity during gutting. I have shot moose before with the TSX and usually what I have seen is a 1"-1.5" hole drilled throught the lungs not the jello often seen on smaller game like deer. May have something to do with the claim that the LRX is made to open a lower velocity for long range.

- The large shoulder bone (humerus?) was pulverised. Shards of bone and bone dust everywhere.

- Lots of bloodshot meat in the opposite shoulder. Not that surprising considering that bone was struck and the speed of impact.

IMG_4761.jpg
 
By now I bet you had your 35.
With the Long Range bullet, it would have performed more in line with its capabilities once the velocity had been shed.
Much like shooting a mule deer with an 8mm Remington Mag; lost the near shoulder and blew the far one off. Was using the 185 grain bullet versus the 220 grain load.
No sense second guessing your choice under these circumstanses and start preparing for a long range opportunity in the future.
 
Considering the short range and bone matter that it went through, it's not the performance usually seen with Barnes, but evidently quite adequate.
I suspect you would have found small fragments at best with a bullet like a Berger, and not in the opposite shoulder.
 
No, no concerns at all. With an impact velocity of somewhere between 2900-2950fps and the smashed bone it's understandable that even a Barnes bullet would loose a few petals. Look at how the solid copper core of the bullet has bulged compared to the new one. I can only imagine what a cup-core would look like! I still want to test in some media at some point how low the LRX will open compared to a regular TTSX. From this example of one, there is some indication that they do open easier/faster than a TTSX.
 
By now I bet you had your 35.

Sure did. Although even the 35 is not immune. This was a finisher on a bull moose. Through the head and lenghtwise through about a foot of spine.
35Whelen225grjpg.jpg


Actually, I wished I had my .444 Marlin. I've been looking for an opportunity to bloody it.
 
What load are you using? I tried the 175gr LRX in my 300WSM and got inconsistent accuracy. It was drinvg me nuts as every other Barnes bulelt I've fed it (130gr TTSX, 150gr TTSX and 180gr TSX) shoots well under MOA. Usually cloverleafs. Actually, the 168gr TSX had acceptable accuracy for a hunting rifle (1.5 MOA) but not great, so I don't use those, either.
 
What load are you using? I tried the 175gr LRX in my 300WSM and got inconsistent accuracy. It was drinvg me nuts as every other Barnes bulelt I've fed it (130gr TTSX, 150gr TTSX and 180gr TSX) shoots well under MOA. Usually cloverleafs. Actually, the 168gr TSX had acceptable accuracy for a hunting rifle (1.5 MOA) but not great, so I don't use those, either.

65gr of H4350 and 68.5gr of RL19 (both max loads) gave me MOA and 3000fps. Both are a on the hot side and I may try to fine tune them when I have more time.
 
I guess I'll try some more H4350 :) I'm sure I tried it already but I'd have to double check.

145gr LRX worked great on a moose my buddy shot with his 7-08 at 230 yards. Destroyed shoulder with some wasted meat but not as much as had it been a lead core bullet. Chewed right through, but for the most part only the area directly around the wound was damaged. No shrapnel flying off everywhere, and we salvaged about 75% of the shoulder, maybe more.
 
I am using 200 gr LRX in my 300 RUM..While we were hunting moose I shot a bear. The bear ran off , so I tracked it and found it. Wondered why it went so far. My hunting partner showed me why..I had my scope on 5 power and shot through a 4" tree first..couldn't believe how that bullet stayed together.
 
I am using 200 gr LRX in my 300 RUM..While we were hunting moose I shot a bear. The bear ran off , so I tracked it and found it. Wondered why it went so far. My hunting partner showed me why..I had my scope on 5 power and shot through a 4" tree first..couldn't believe how that bullet stayed together.

Probably just had a 'stump" of a bullet when it impacted the bear, similar to the pic above.
 
I recovered a 100gr tsx from my 257 way. Bullet went through the neck several inches of spine and the last rib. Was found under hide. It was just the shank. No petals left. I shot that buck at 200yards iirc and the bullet started out at 3650 so it was still cruising.
 
People used to complain about the old X bullet losing petals. I don't know why, since they opened very well and killed well. Who cares if it loses the petals?
 
Back
Top Bottom