While you are on the site, in your browser find and click "Add to Home Screen" A CGN beaver app icon will then be created to your phone that is directly link to the site.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe the original 92s have a heel mag release. Therefore, the mag catch slot would probably need to be tweak to fit in the 92fs' "Amercian style" side mag release.
I believe the original 92s have a heel mag release. Therefore, the mag catch slot would probably need to be tweak to fit in the 92fs' "Amercian style" side mag release.
The question isn't as daft as it sounds. The origional 92 had the funky Beretta type of mag catch located at the bottom rear of the left grip panel. You'll notice most factory 92 mags still have a cut out in that spot. Anyone with a Beretta 950 will know the style I'm talking about.
JB, if the mags in your hand have the cut outs on either side on the front of the mag towards the middle, they will fit in a 92fs. If they don't, forgetaboutit
as Canuck said, the older mags (pre FS) had only the heal release cuts. But like mentioned, if you have mags and they have the cuts up higher on both sides, then they will work in any of the current 92's.
it's been my experience the supply problem is the other way round- the 92 and 92sb with the heel catch are getting hard to come by, the ones with the triggerguard are far more common- i got one from usa magazines that had both- look at it this way, if it's got the heel catch hole and you don't use it, you've got a drain hole-
Not a bad question. I bought a Hogue rubber wrap-around grip with finger grooves for a Beretta 92fs; only to find out that it does not fit my Beretta 92fs Vertec. So now I have a grip for a Beretta for sale.
It actually does fit. You just need to use a razor blade to slowly slice off the extra rubber at the end of the grip near the backstrap. Many members over at the Berettaforum have done this and it'll only take you 15 minutes to do.