I've persnally tried Viht-550, RL19 (most accurate powder for 180 grainers in the Nosler and Barnes Manuals, respectively), H4350, IMR4350, and RL17 (not a full test - velocities were so high with RL17 - I lost my nerve even in the absence of over-pressure indicators).
IMR4350 was the most accurate (four of five 3-shot groups went sub-MOA - average for 5 groups was .87"). However each group had a noticably different POI (not ideal when using the OCW method of load development).
H4350 had no group that went sub-MOA (closest was 1.03"; largest group 1.54"), However, it pretty much had the same POI (very desirable when using the OCW method). I will plan on playing with bullet seating depth to see if I can tighten these up becasue as far a powders, it is more prefereable (virtually identically POI across a diverse load weights, and this powder is said to be less sensitive to temperature extremes).
All other powders averaged in the 1.5" - 2.0" range (i.e., nothing to write home about).
I surveyed the Nosler forum and 24hourcampfire sites. The most common "pet load" powders encountered on this sites for 180 grainers in a .300 WSM, in order of most to least common, were (1) H4350 (2) IMR4350, (3) IMR4831 (IM4831 was generally "better" than IMR4350 for 165 grainers).
In short my experience, and the research of others would suggest to start with these three powders.
BTW - Most powders tested with Barnes Bullets (MRX and TTSX 180 grainers).