Another vote for cross referencing. Some of the variations you see in reloading data can be explained by differences in the components used. Case capacity of brass and differing primer brisance between brands used when developing the data can explain some of the disparities. Some loads are developed in pressure barrels with a universal receiver others in a common firearm which again could lead to discrepancies.
Some cartridges have no SAAMI pressure standard and different reloading manuals may be loading to different pressures. Some manuals provide data for older cartridges such as the 45-70 that are far above SAAMI pressures for use in much stronger and more modern firearms, opinions of just how much pressure the new more modern firearms can be safely loaded to can variate between the different camps developing the loads.
If two manuals show different max loads for the same cartridge, take note of which primers, and brass are being used. Also note the test firearm and barrel length, this will likely explain some of the variance. As for who's data is best, I can't tell you, choose the data that matches you components and firearm. I always prefer the data to include the pressure that the starting and max loads develop. Some manuals don't do this.