Breakdown/M1 Garand/1931

Clancy

Regular
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Gentlemen,
The picture speaks for itself. Notice the small changes in areas of the breakdown.
Come on guys if you want this stuff just hit my sites a few times a day. If it is that hard for you then it could become very hard for me to post. anything any more.


Try to put in some info/question and we can learn more of the M1's HistoryWithout input from you guys no one learns


1031.jpg


b11.jpg

There are more odd files like the one above. Thanks to Spiggy Zuo

Reminderflag-1.jpg


Could use some help with hits to my sites.
Thanks again
Clancy
Looking for Sponsors
NRA Life Endowment
NRA Training Counselor
NRA Instructor
FSS 90% / BW X Speed Div by 1000 = PF
 
Sorry fellow - I'm not certain what the site in question is here :redface:

It's in his profile.... ;)

http: // www. garandm1rifle. com/

It's a "loss leader posting" to generate sales of $30 U.S. CD's and other government historical paper based information relating to the Garand.

Lots of public domain Garand information he's collected over the years if you want to pay for it from once source, as opposed to "googling" or digging it up yourself the hard way. There are a large amount of nice free files like the one above (and other posts) on his site, if you're into Garand history but really don't want to buy anything.

Regards,
Badger
 
Last edited:
HOLY CRAP...that is a "gas trap" garand in the photo...Correct in saying it is Serial Number 1
WOW...Very Cool!!!
I had on of those in my hands a few years ago (not for sale though).
It was VERY nice!!!!!
Keep up the posting on the Garand info!!!!
Thanks a million.
Cheers
 
Last edited:
It's great if you want to share information but some peolpe may not be as interested in the history of the Garand as you seem to be. Quit trying to force the issue and more people might show some support. Also I don't know if you should be soliciting for your site. Maybe you would find more participation for the Garand on a US site. American weapons certainly don't turn my crank!!!!!!!
 
It's great if you want to share information but some peolpe may not be as interested in the history of the Garand as you seem to be. Quit trying to force the issue and more people might show some support. Also I don't know if you should be soliciting for your site. Maybe you would find more participation for the Garand on a US site. American weapons certainly don't turn my crank!!!!!!!

Here is a very honest suggestion.
Stop reading these posts and look for something you are interested in.
There are a lot more members who find this information posted by Clancy interesting. You sound disgruntled???
Here is an interesting observation...there is a militaria collectors forum who stated they were there for miltaria collectors...however they promoted "nazi" garbage and put all other U.S. and Commonwealth at the bottom of the pile and in a very small section. It seemed as if they did accept that fact that the U.S and the Commonwealth countries defeated the "nazi's". I no longer frequent that forum since I strongly object to the promotion of anything "nazi" related.
Using your opinion as you stated it would be a good assumption that you fully agree that anything mauser related should be put on a "nazi" website only and anything Lee Enfield related should only be on a British website only.
How foolish does that sound?
Cheers
 
You are reading it wrong. I'm just suggesting that for more in depth discussion on the Garand he might check out a specialty site. He states "Come on guys if you want this stuff just hit my sites a few times a day. If it is that hard for you then it could become very hard for me to post. anything any more." I just find it funny that he says he can't post any more information if other Nutz don't post regarding the Garand or go to his site. Sounds a little childish too me. Maybe posting on several sites might be more rewarding for Clancy. Clancy just sounded fed up with this site. Anyway I was just giving my thoughts on his post.
Actully you (Alonzo) sound a little bitter. Slow down man. I in no way made any suggestions about what should be posted. I enjoy many of the posts and have found some good information here. I get a kick out of your assumptions from reading my post. I don't think you need separate sites by weapon and or country. That would be crazy.
I collect pre 1898 Canadian military weapons primarily but will buy other items that strike my fancy. For the record I have no interest personally in collecting US military weapons. I think it's great if others collect it and wish them all the best in finding that one piece that will top their collection. FREE SPEECH IS A WONDERFUL THING.
 
You are reading it wrong. I'm just suggesting that for more in depth discussion on the Garand he might check out a specialty site. He states "Come on guys if you want this stuff just hit my sites a few times a day. If it is that hard for you then it could become very hard for me to post. anything any more." I just find it funny that he says he can't post any more information if other Nutz don't post regarding the Garand or go to his site. Sounds a little childish too me. Maybe posting on several sites might be more rewarding for Clancy. Clancy just sounded fed up with this site. Anyway I was just giving my thoughts on his post.
Actully you (Alonzo) sound a little bitter. Slow down man. I in no way made any suggestions about what should be posted. I enjoy many of the posts and have found some good information here. I get a kick out of your assumptions from reading my post. I don't think you need separate sites by weapon and or country. That would be crazy.
I collect pre 1898 Canadian military weapons primarily but will buy other items that strike my fancy. For the record I have no interest personally in collecting US military weapons. I think it's great if others collect it and wish them all the best in finding that one piece that will top their collection. FREE SPEECH IS A WONDERFUL THING.

You are right...I kind of made a few assumptions based on what has occured on another forum as I mentioned. :redface:
I see what you mean about the request to support the website mentioned and to show support for the posts here. Feedback from fellow collectors is incredibly important, since everyone has a different view of an item. Especially when new information surfaces on a specific firearm. There is considerable interest in firearms of this type in Canada, I am sure you would agree. The popularity of the Garand may be linked to the Canadian connection to the the Garand and to Springfield Armory. This...I am sure you know comes from The designer himself...John C. Garand who was raised in St. Remi Quebec. Any collection of military firearms needs a Garand...even a Canadian military collection. Just IMHO;)
Fifteen years ago I wrote a research paper on the Custer Battlefield on the firearms used at the battle and their actual field characteristic related to ballistics and accuracy. I presented the paper in 1992 at the Custer battlefield Historical Museum Association symposium. It created quite a stir amongst the authors and noted historians present. It was actually a lot of fun talking with these guys about something they knew nothing about. It was a learning experience for all. The one thing that I found offensive after the presentation was that very few people in Canada were interested in the history of that era(Custer era) and seemed to view it with disdain. Too bad I guess.
My distaste for certain things(nazi/imperial japan) comes from discussions with old veterans and citizens who have experienced the brunt of military atrocities during WW2. I am rather biased when it come this...I admit.
There is considerable merit to specialty websites on a specific models of firearms. I really don't have much issue with the promotion of said websites on this forum in anyway...in fact I would promote it as that is the prupose of a furom as I mentioned.
I have been asked why I do not have a german or japanese uniform in the collection...I have absoultely zero interest in that and would not waste good money on something of that type. I actually got into trouble with a good friend of mine who is a highly advanced military collector...I gave him a rough time about an SS uniform he had. He read me the "riot act" :mad: and explained the concept of owning siad uniforms when it is related to his specialty. I understand the concept though would not pursue it myself.
I think the whole idea of a forum is to educate people on a specific subject. That is what has been happening here with the information Clancy has been posting. There are aspects of the production and development of the Garand that I never knew. I thank Clancy for posting this and keep up the great work.
I did not mean to offend you Junkman...my apologies:redface:
 
Gentlemen,
I would like to apologies to Alonzo and to Junkman for asking for some help.
Thanks for taking the time and effort to have read my posts. It is just the history of one rifle and I understand it does not have any history data that is worth getting into any trouble over. I hope you have enjoyed some of it.
Clancy
 
Gentlemen,
I would like to apologies to Alonzo and to Junkman for asking for some help.
Thanks for taking the time and effort to have read my posts. It is just the history of one rifle and I understand it does not have any history data that is worth getting into any trouble over. I hope you have enjoyed some of it.
Clancy

Clancy;
First off...no need to apologize to either of us...Junkman and I have had a very good discussion on this subject.
I thoroughly enjoy your posts...though I may not post a reply I do read them and at times need to re-read them just to digest what is happening in the minds of the ordnance dept. of the era. Much like the development of the Trapdoor breech loading system the Garand went through it's growing pains and suffered at the hands/pen of government accountants.
Having collected Springfield Armory firearms for nearly 25 years I developed the collection to the point that common stuff just were duplicates. It took some time but I was able to secure several very rare variations of different models made at the Armory. Unfortunately, most of these have long since been liquidated and turned into other military collectibles. I appreciate your dedication to presenting information as you find it and do look forward to reading/learning more.
Some collectors (myself included presently) tend to turn a blind eye to things they are not interested in and may view those who collect said things as less then serious or knowledgable about the hobby. I personally ran into this at gun shows while displaying parts of my Springfield collection. I had several Winchester collectors ask why I am wasting time collecting Springfields when I should be collecting Winchesters or Colts. After explaining what I had for Win. and Colts in the collection they did not ask again. Some of these fellows could not understand why an 1880 Triangular Ram Rod bayonet rifle (one of 1015 made) was worth more then their average 80% condition 1873 Winchester...interesting conversation it was.
Keep up the good work Clancy, I look forward to your next post.
Cheers
 
Back
Top Bottom