Thank you tiriaq, Gotenda sells M1 with chest, no scope. searched reviews M1 is no good in accuration. most owner buy M1 for an affection.The one you picture is the sniper version, like an M-1D. Some were sold in their chests, complete with M-84 scopes. Others seem to have been scope free.
Fine M-1 type rifles. A 7.62x51 Garand is an excellent shooter.
Value? $2000-$5000, Tipo 2, or sniper without/with scope & chest?
There was an older guy with a various bunch of garands starting at like $2300. Now i didnt take a closer look to see if they were bredas or something else.At chilliwack gun show last week
Rifle with scope and chest $4500
Rifle with scope no chest $3800 (I think)
Rifle with Chest and no scope $3500 (I think)
Droooooll. But holy friggin' $Hi everyone, I’m planning to get an M1 Garand rifle and I’ve been searching for reviews on various websites, but there aren’t many, and the ones I found lack details. Has anyone here had experience with the Breda M1 Garand? thanks
View attachment 919608
What do you mean by "accurcation"?How about Tipo2 M1Ds accuracation?
Probably accuracy, language translation thingy.What do you mean by "accurcation"?
A 7.62 Garand is as accurate as a .30-06 Garand, in the hands of an ordinary long range shooter. If the trigger puller is a US NRA High Master President's 100 and Distinguished, there will be differences.How about Tipo2 M1Ds accuracation?
is it all 7.62 NATO is from Re-chambered 30-06? What problems can this cause?A 7.62 Garand is as accurate as a .30-06 Garand, in the hands of an ordinary long range shooter. If the trigger puller is a US NRA High Master President's 100 and Distinguished, there will be differences.
In my experience, .30-06 is more expensive and harder to feed in Canada than 7.62 NATO. Factory and FMJ. Forget trying to convince me that handloading is the way; you're not in the same league as the average shooter if you can crank 200-300 identical rounds.
Group sizes are probably 2-minutes of angle. The acceptance standards were generous. These were converted battle rifles, not bench-made accurized bolt actions. The M84 scope is inferior to the No.32 IMHO, although the latter is harder to zero, its tube diameter and lenses are bigger for better light transmission.
YES! Look for authoritative Italian heel markings, not rebuilt Danish FKF marked receivers.The Italians shortened everything else too, like the stock and op rod.
The conversions are reliable and nothing to worry about, so long as you use proper tippo 2 op rods, stocks and barrels as replacement parts when needed.
Also, there are a few guns that look like tippo 2 rifles build in danish receivers, imported before the current batch, where the retailer welded in the bolt lugs and assembly was questionable. Those guns should be avoided, they aren’t safe in my opinion.
A 7.62 Garand is as accurate as a .30-06 Garand, in the hands of an ordinary long range shooter. If the trigger puller is a US NRA High Master President's 100 and Distinguished, there will be differences.
In my experience, .30-06 is more expensive and harder to feed in Canada than 7.62 NATO. Factory and FMJ. Forget trying to convince me that handloading is the way; you're not in the same league as the average shooter if you can crank 200-300 identical rounds.
Hi everyone, I’m planning to get an M1 Garand rifle and I’ve been searching for reviews on various websites, but there aren’t many, and the ones I found lack details. Has anyone here had experience with the Breda M1 Garand? thanks
Will replacing the barrel improve accuracy?"Identical", eh?
Well it's impossible to have two of anything that's identical so I'm certainly never going to convince you of that.
However, if you move onto accepting that handholding for accuracy isn't necessarily over obsessing over rounds being "identical" as possible (save that for the bench rest shooters trying to put rounds into the same hole,
shooting from sleds and with their fancy analytical balances) you can hopefully grasp that by simply using a nicer bullet than you find in non premium commericsl ammo, such as a sierra, hornady, or nosler and by weighing each charge individually to a tenth of a grain, you can substantially outperform all of the bulk and regular grade commercial ammo out there for less cost in components then would cost to buy it.
That's without any real work up or tuning a load for a particular rifle, the bar for the average ammo you get if you were to just walk into a store and pick whatever box of 30-06 at a middling price point is actually quite low compared to what you can do with just a single stage press, good quality (not expensive) bullets,a beam scale, and *basic* attention to detail. It's *well* within the grasp of the average shooter to do so.
That said you're right as far as garands go x51 is definitely the way to go, and the stigma behind them being not ad good is largely people thinking they are not "correct" historically.
By the way, acceptance spec for a regular US Garand back in the day was 4 MOA. Most sniper rifles in that era were spec'd for about 3 MOA (in general, not garands). Most will do better, but a lot of people seriously overestimate just how accurate rifles from that era were, if you're actually ever consistently shooting honest 2 MOA groups with any garand, snipers included, you've had a lot of things line up in your favor and are having a good day. I wouldn't ever expect that.
nah. the garand is a great rifle, potentially the absolute best milsurp, but trying to chase accuracy in that platform is a fool's errand. Fundamentally it has a lot of things working against it accuracy wise, the whole action is just retained in the stock in by sandwiching it between the receiver and trigger group, which very handily pops right off with a flick of the trigger guard, as well as lots of sloopy contact between the forend/upper handguard and the barrel.Will replacing the barrel improve accuracy?