Brownells take on Ruger 10/22: BRN-22

[ambishooter]

Pardon my post (Dlask Arms), no offense meant against your *TUF-22*.

Just curious as to who is willing to bring this to Canuckstan.

https://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/receivers/barreled-receivers/brn-22-barreled-receiver-for-ruger-10-22--prod116209.aspx

The more options we have, the better pricing as long as the loonie stays within its level or appreciates against the the southern buck.

 

[Sun_and_Steel_77]

I like it, one of my gripes with the DAR-22 was always how tall the profile was with that hideous integral picattiny rail hanging out forward of the receiver.
That brn-22 seems to have a much lower and cleaner profile from looking at the pictures.

 

[P12]

That looks like a good deal for a receiver and a 16" or 10" barrel.

 

[KND]

You can get a non rail version of 10/22 receiver from Dlask Arms.

 

[airbatic]

Interesting enough one day I saw dlask made 10/22 rails for sale on Brownells...

 

[JD22-250]

Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m not sure we can order a receiver from the us because that is a”firearm” because it’s the serialized part of the 10/22 right??? Would it require us to get a 3rd party importer?

 

[baldabe]

It says delivery to FFL, so that rules out anything but an importer for us Canucks.

 

[JD22-250]

It says delivery to FFL, so that rules out anything but an importer for us Canucks.

Figured as much.

 

[ambishooter]

But if a CDN Dealer decides to pursue the elaborate trail of the paperwork, we should be able to see one.
I think the DLASK version is still the way to go. As soon as we see the first run (Rev. 0), improvements based on user opinions can make it even better than the Brownells version.

 

[G.Mitchell]

The price is tempting for sure, won't be as tempting with import fees and such.

Also isn't there a DLASK version that will be using proprietary mags to give us full mag capacity back?