YouAreInOilCountry
Regular
- Location
- Terrace, BC
I shot both the Browning 1911 A1 .22 Black Label and full frame GSG 1911 .22 from a distance of about 12 yards. To my surprise, I found the smaller framed Browning more accurate. I attributed the high Browning shots to the smaller frame. I do not know why the GSG repeatedly shot low right, although sure, it could have been me. However, the results repeated over several targets. The target picture has the Browning target on the left, GSG on the right.
I understand that the Browning is a no nonsense 1911. The Browning sights are part of the polymer slide as one piece. I would really appreciate painted dot sights, or at least indents where I could apply paint. The sight picture on the Browning is awful, especially given how small the frame and slide are. In contrast, the sights on the GSG are excellent, and adjustable. (Maybe I should adjust the sights
A friend remarked that the Browning 1911 A1 .22 might make a perfect side arm for a trapper, given its small frame and being so light. I can't argue that it would be a much better choice than the GSG. That said, the light .22 calibre would be an awful light choice, out on a remote trap line. Both the Browning and GSG make fun 1911 target guns. The GSG would make a far better practise gun, as it has a full frame, and might be of use as a cheap calibre to practise draw and firing.
Honestly, I lost all interest in firing .45ACP or 9mm. The pair of .22's I own pass the time, when I'm volunteering as range safety officer for my clubs indoor range, and no other shooters are present. My true love is trap shooting.
Attachments
Last edited:





























Once the powder shortage is over I'll do more center fire shooting.But right now .22 ammo is plentiful around here and was and still is FUN!























