I own two; love them. Plenty accurate. Also will cycle anything reliably: low or hv 22lr.
Does anyone have any experience in how accurate this 22lr is?
Maybe you should suggest to us what kind of accuracy you want/need/expect/dream of having?
All the ones I have shot, as well as the Norc clones, have been great carry guns for a walk in the woods and potting the odd grouse.
If you hope to be competitive n any target discipline, then, well, no.
If you have the extra money for a Browning, don't even consider the cooey 64. The Browning is a far better made and balanced. 22 made by craftsmen, while in comparison a cooey 64 is like a 2x4 with a pipe hose clamped to the top, with crappy pot metal mags that wear out and jam eventually. The ones I grew up with were terrible in every way.
If a semi auto jams too much, you eventually want to toss it into a pond and walk away, which is probably how some of them ended up.
Browning had before his time engineering understanding of the most minimalistic type. His lever action, 1911, SA 22 and all his others inventions have been in use for so long. Though I am a fairly large fellow I like a short pull and light gun. Every thing I have read and watched on YouTube states that on the characteristics of this rifle is its balance. Not many other rifle models have really stated this as a strenth or characteristic of their rifles. I don't know what an SA rear sight actually looks like but I seem to get a very good sight picture with a rectangularly or squared rear sight as opposed to a v shaped rear sight. What is the shape of the standard rear sight and if not rectangular or square would I be able to change this. Any suggestions as to with what.