I have read a lot of things individually about these shotguns
I'm thinking that the words or phrase "read about" should not be used in the same sentence as "shotgun"
they are much too subjective and relative to the individuals body. they can not be simply measured up and reported on like a rifle. there is not even a rear sight on the things..........it is our dominant eye, so every thing is much too subjective to make an informed choice from reading.
having said that, the reading can narrow the field if there is some criteria like barrel length, ability to cycle a variety of loads since we are talking semi auto's here, type and way of dismantling for routine maintenance: stuff like that
i wanted a gun that would withstand bad weather as i had some frustrations with actions crapping out with mud in the past, so i went to the Alaskan hunting forums and read that the SX3 was the king of coping with crud, so i went and shouldered a bunch of those. no fit; nothing hit.
so i tried the browning since, i "read" that they were virtually the same. this gun fit me -happy day! the Remington did not. I am not concerned with 3 1/2 inch so i now have a silver hunter in wood with 28" barrels and 3" chamber and a whole bunch of geese now that i have found the federal black cloud ammo and the Carlson choke made for that ammo.
so for this body type, or whatever, the silver hunter is now the 'meat in the pot' gun. And the wood is tough, i have waded through thick brush deer hunting with it and it resists scratching really well, strangely well.............I love the gun and have used it for 3 seasons and it does cycle everything from the lightest target loads to the kick my pants off 3" mag 00buckshot with out a hiccup. And it is easy to clean too.
sorry for the long post, i find the reading can go only so far for shotguns: then
action is needed: chase the item of interest down and shoulder and touch, feel, fiddle with etc. shotties are a difficulty to purchase sight unseen - for me any way.
~jsd