Hello,
Fairly new to casting and just got my 2nd rifle caliber mold a few weeks ago. It took some searching, but I finally found a Lyman 280468 on the EE for my 270 Win.
Not having a lube sizer (yet) I opted for a Lee .278 sizing die. I expected it to produce a .278 bullet, but they come out at .2795.
I was about to load up my first batch of ammo tonight, but this was bugging me. I decided instead to slug my bore. Not sure why I did not do this a long time ago, but regardless it came out at .2755.
I don’t have a hardness tester, but have been casting the bullets pretty hard. Half are 1 WW to 1 Linotype, the rest are 2 WW to 1 Linotype. All are gas checked, some powder coated, some Alox, some both.
Questions:
1) Is it common for a sizing die to produce bullets not exactly to size?
2) Is the .004 oversize I’m dealing with a concern?
3) Does hardness make it more of a concern?
4) Could the hardness and cast size effect the sizing dies performance?
Thanks for the help
MRM
Fairly new to casting and just got my 2nd rifle caliber mold a few weeks ago. It took some searching, but I finally found a Lyman 280468 on the EE for my 270 Win.
Not having a lube sizer (yet) I opted for a Lee .278 sizing die. I expected it to produce a .278 bullet, but they come out at .2795.
I was about to load up my first batch of ammo tonight, but this was bugging me. I decided instead to slug my bore. Not sure why I did not do this a long time ago, but regardless it came out at .2755.
I don’t have a hardness tester, but have been casting the bullets pretty hard. Half are 1 WW to 1 Linotype, the rest are 2 WW to 1 Linotype. All are gas checked, some powder coated, some Alox, some both.
Questions:
1) Is it common for a sizing die to produce bullets not exactly to size?
2) Is the .004 oversize I’m dealing with a concern?
3) Does hardness make it more of a concern?
4) Could the hardness and cast size effect the sizing dies performance?
Thanks for the help
MRM