after i finished prepping some cases for the .223 i started to play around with my digital rcbs scale and weighing bullets and things and found a possible oddity.
my 69 grain .223 bullets tracked fine all the way up to the cutoff weight of my scale at 1500 grains, @ 21 bullets i was at 1449.1 grains which is only .1 grain off, which surprised me.
so i started to weigh the bullets one at a time, and same thing, dead on.
then i went to my 7mm bullets and started with the nosler 140 grain ballistic tips, and they were at 1399.9 after 10, so .1 under.
the oddity i found was when i started to do my hornady A-Max 162 grain bullets, i found most bullets were .2 grains heavy, a few were dead on, and then some were as much as .5 grains heavy
is that normal, especially for a match bullet?
i guess in reality its only about what, a third of a percent, but still, the others were dead on, and that includes a hunting bullet, which you would think would have the looser tolerances.
my 69 grain .223 bullets tracked fine all the way up to the cutoff weight of my scale at 1500 grains, @ 21 bullets i was at 1449.1 grains which is only .1 grain off, which surprised me.
so i started to weigh the bullets one at a time, and same thing, dead on.
then i went to my 7mm bullets and started with the nosler 140 grain ballistic tips, and they were at 1399.9 after 10, so .1 under.
the oddity i found was when i started to do my hornady A-Max 162 grain bullets, i found most bullets were .2 grains heavy, a few were dead on, and then some were as much as .5 grains heavy
is that normal, especially for a match bullet?
i guess in reality its only about what, a third of a percent, but still, the others were dead on, and that includes a hunting bullet, which you would think would have the looser tolerances.