Burris Fullfield II Tactical vs Xtreme Tactical

HK Hopeful

BANNED
BANNED
BANNED
EE Expired
Rating - 91.7%
11   1   0
I read the descriptions for these 2 scopes on the Burris site. What is your opinion of them? Descriptions are fine but I'm looking for some real world experience here. The approx $700 increase for the Xtreme series is a lot of cash if the differences are minimal. If it makes any difference, the scope would be mounted on a Tikka SuperVarmint .308. Thanks.
 
I have fullfield II's (4.5X14) on my savage 308 and 223. They are great value for money. Obviously not in the same league as my 30mm Leupold but a damned fine scope, puts Bushnell to shame.

Brian
 
in general, you will get better glass (less edge distortion, better resolution and coatings), better waterproofing, ruggedised internal, thicker scope tube material, more metal to metal contact in the internal workings.

Unless you plan on bouncing your rifle across the countryside, the modern quality hunting scope is more rugged then any hunter is likely to use.

Jerry
 
Back
Top Bottom