Bushnell Tactical 6-24x50

bucktomcat

bucktomcat

Regular
Rating - 100%
121   0   1
Want to hear from people who actually own one, illuminated reticle or not either one.

What are the pros and cons and are you happy with your purchase.

Thanks
 
I have one with an non-illuminated mildot. I first tried it on a .300 wm with out any issues. Now it shoots flawlessly on a .308. It sees better than I do and is caplable of shooting the same as my NF. Durablitiy as to Milspecs may be different but as far as civilian shooting requirements go I believe that it's durability is more than enough. I have another scope with an illuminated terticle, personally I believe that illuminated or non-illuminated reticle is a personal thing. Some of the people I know who use rifles as part of their duties have mixed feelings and views on it. If you get one with an illuminated reticle and do not like it you can always leave it of. Either way you can't go wrong.

Would I buy another one........Yes
 
I covered this in a review I wrote ( stickied at top of precision rifle forum ). Take away message = very good value scope, crosshairs a bit thick but otherwise a good deal.
 
I too would like to hear some feedback on the new 6-24x50 Tactical (FFP eh?), seems there has been changes between their 3200-4200 lines recently and I'm thinking it was more than just a name change and included real upgrades.
I just got a little 10x40 for the .22, great deal so it has me intrigued about their higher end tactical model, but none to look into locally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom