*cough**cough*NAVY*cough*.KevinB said:all depends
I had a rifle team C7A1 that was submoa - if I did my part.
However guns get beat up in the field -- plus you get morons that will scrape the muzzle crown not knowing that it will affect accuracy.
I've seen C7A2's that would not group under 10"
Billnye said:You also have senior NCO;s that insist that you scrap that crown with the piler end of a gerber till its shiny against the protests of the young private.......
Rohann said:Depends; we have some C7's on BMQ made 15 years ago, and then there's the spiffed up C7A2's that shoot really damn well.
-Rohann
NavyShooter said:Some other Navy person must be disrespecting a rifle in that fashion, 'cause it sure ain't no-one I've trained.
Billnye said:You also have senior NCO;s that insist that you scrape that crown with the piler end of a gerber till its shiny against the protests of the young private.......
Rohann said:None of our instructors were morons. They all told us to pull through only from the chamber to muzzle. They'd kick us in the pants if we used our Gerber on anything but pulling out the firing pin retaining pin.
-Rohann
Leg said:FYI the military requirement for the rifle and ammo is 4". Most will group a lot better than that, and the odd one won't group worth a damn.
That is appalling, I think the SLR was 20 rounds in 4 groups of five to produce an overall group not exceeding 100mm. That was the minimum or you went back to training on the marksmanship principles.tekriter MK 1 said:Close. The manual says:
"At 100 metres - Ten rounds shall fall within, or break the line of a square with sides not exceeding 13.2 centimetres (5.2 inches);" to be serviceable.
Firing blanks is just as bad as scraping the crown.