The folding ability along with field adjustable (without tools) LOP and cheek piece, in addition to the defined pistol grip check all the boxes for me. What have the owners of a Cadex chassis found that they don't like? I know it's heavy.
It looks like the higher butt pad and optic mount means the bore is lower compared to the shooter/rear support and the recoil is more rearward and less rotational? Does it work like this in practice? Maybe I'm just overthinking this....I do not own one, but have spent a fair bit of time behind one. A downside is yet to be determined; the chassis works perfectly for me.
The unit I have been using was a little finicky to insert the mags for the first few mags, which cleared up as the finish in the magwell worked in.
Go for it! I am taking a hard look at a personal one as well...
Adam