Was playing with the ballistic calculator on "biggameinfoDOTcom" came up with the following info.
Hornaby 123gr. sp @ 2325 = 1476 ft/lbs muzzle
= 1105 ft/lbs 100 yards
= 813 ft/lbs 200 yards (still good for deer!)
$0.23 for bullet
Lee C312-160-2R @ 2000 = 1421 ft/lbs muzzle
= 1073 ft/lbs 100 yards
= 803 ft/lbs 200 yards (still good for deer!)
$0.06 for bullet and gas check
The only real advantage that I see is the cost savings over the jacketed ones. Maybe the heavier cast will penetrate more? I have been using WLR primers, I wonder if CCI military primers would get me a few more fps out of my loads. The hornaby is loaded with 26.5 grains of Rl-7 and the cast is loaded with H335 27grains (case full).
Hornaby 123gr. sp @ 2325 = 1476 ft/lbs muzzle
= 1105 ft/lbs 100 yards
= 813 ft/lbs 200 yards (still good for deer!)
$0.23 for bullet
Lee C312-160-2R @ 2000 = 1421 ft/lbs muzzle
= 1073 ft/lbs 100 yards
= 803 ft/lbs 200 yards (still good for deer!)
$0.06 for bullet and gas check
The only real advantage that I see is the cost savings over the jacketed ones. Maybe the heavier cast will penetrate more? I have been using WLR primers, I wonder if CCI military primers would get me a few more fps out of my loads. The hornaby is loaded with 26.5 grains of Rl-7 and the cast is loaded with H335 27grains (case full).