I think using stills would reduce your costs considerable, not to mention it's far less data to transmit. Unless you are doing very quick follow up shots, then a video or live feed is not required. Take the shot, trigger a photo, review photo, take another shot, repeat as required. A still version for out to 200m would be nice for us of greying eyes.
There would be no real cost savings as you still need all the transmission equipment. You would be replacing the $100 video camera with a $200 plus digital camera.