haha, well, seeing how there aren't enough GM, or M, or even As in production to 'count', I won't be paying to have my scores from any upcoming ICS stages forwarded - I'll be happy to stay a B, since nothing higher will get recognized (and most of my local competition is also classed B (Earl, Tan, etc). Haha, just noticed, Brent who came in at 98.9% in Barrie is a C!
You know, I think that ICS should be used as a minimum class you can declare at the nationals. Personally, I think that people like ipsc1, Nick M, myself, Brent, Tan, Slavex, etc should be able to say "just shove us into a higher class, and we'll see what happens."
With ICS, it seems like the idea is that some quantified system, no matter how unrealistic its results are, is better than an "estimated" one.
I don't mind getting bumped into the top class with those aforementioned names, in fact, I would prefer that. But if that's not going to happen, fine, I'll deal with the system as it is now, and go to Kingston a B.
You know, I think that ICS should be used as a minimum class you can declare at the nationals. Personally, I think that people like ipsc1, Nick M, myself, Brent, Tan, Slavex, etc should be able to say "just shove us into a higher class, and we'll see what happens."
With ICS, it seems like the idea is that some quantified system, no matter how unrealistic its results are, is better than an "estimated" one.
I don't mind getting bumped into the top class with those aforementioned names, in fact, I would prefer that. But if that's not going to happen, fine, I'll deal with the system as it is now, and go to Kingston a B.





















































