Comparison of Four .22LR Rifles and 28 Varieties of Ammunition

DVCCalgary

New member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Comparison of Four .22LR Rifles and 28 Varieties of Ammunition
Author: Ken Bell 31 July 2020

Abstract

The objective of this project is to examine the variability of .22 LR loads shot from four different .22 LR rifles, three bolt rifles and one semi-auto rifle. There are a total of 9 brands with 6 brands having multiple loadings and 3 brands with only a single loading included. The bullet weights were either 36 grain or 40 grain. The brand labelled their loadings as standard velocity, high velocity or match.
The four rifles used were brand new Browning T-bolt left hand, Savage Mark II heavy barrel, Lithgow LA 101, and a more well used Ruger 10/22 heavy barrel. Brands of ammunition included: BBM, CCI, Eley, Federal, Lapua, RWS, Remington, SK, and Winchester. Nominally over 2250 rounds were fired to complete testing.
Executive Summary
Bullet diameters ranged from as low as 0.222” for Federal Premium Target 40 grain lead round nose to 0.225” for CCI AR Tactical 40 grain lead, Eley Remington Target 40 grain lead and SK Biathlon Sport 40 grain lead. Many bullets exhibited less than 0.005” in variance, most around 0.224” diameter.
The lowest Standard Deviation and Extreme Spread recorded in all four rifles was the SK Rifle Match 40 grain lead ammunition. Standard Deviation and Extreme Spread varied from 4.3/12 in the Lithgow LA 101, to 9.8/33 in the Ruger. The average velocity across the four rifles was 1024 fps, with a spread of just 27 fps for the four average velocities. However, only the Savage Mark II translated that into the best group size, measuring 0.286” H x 0.684” V, shot at 50 meters. Generally, the lowest SD or ES did not always translate into the smallest group size, as odd as that may seem.
All the groups were 10 shot groups shot at 91 yards, unless otherwise stated. All recorded velocities were from 10 shot strings, unless otherwise noted. All chronograph readings were done with a Magneto Speed V3.

Browning T-bolt
Best chronograph readings:
• Winchester Small Game Target and Plinking ran 1242 fps average, 7.6 SD, with an ES of 21
• Winchester Wildcat 22 ran 1156 fps average, 7.3 SD, 23 ES
• SK Rifle Match went 1035 fps average, 8.4 SD, 27 ES

Best accuracy was:
• Eley Remington Match, which shot a 91 yard group measuring 0.635” H x 0.6205” V
• SK Long Range Match ammunition, shooting a 91 yard group that measured 0.755” H x 0.5045” V, with velocity readings of an average of 1061 fps, SD of 12.0 and an ES of 33
Neither of the Winchester loads shot very accurately, averaging group sizes of 2.4” at 91 yards

Lithgow LA 101
Best chronograph readings:
• RWS R50 - showing an average velocity of 1066 fps, SD of 4.2 and ES of 14
• SK Rifle Match, with an average of 1022 fps, 4.3 SD and an ES of 12
• Eley Remington Match with an average of 1063 fps, SD of 5.0, and an ES of 16
Best accuracy:
• Eley Remington Match, with a group size of 0.8375” H x 0.861” V
RWS R50 group size was not that great, at 1.6505” H x 1.3175” V

Savage Mark II
Best chronograph readings:
• Lapua Center-X shot an average of 1027 fps, an SD of 5 and an ES of 14
• SK Rifle Match shot an average of 1008 fps, with an SD of 6.3 and ES of 19
• Lapua Polar Biathlon shot an average of 1039 fps, with an SD of 6.5 and an ES of 21
Best accuracy:
• SK Rifle Match shot a 50 yard group size of just 0.286” H x 0.684” V

Ruger 10/22 Heavy Barrel
Best chronograph readings:
• SK Long Range Match shot an average velocity of 1065, SD of 5.2 and an ES of 16
• Federal Premium Match shot an average of 1057 fps, SD of 9.0 and ES of 31
• Eley Tenex shot an average of 1070, SD of 9.2 and ES of 31
Best accuracy:
• SK Long Range Match – group size was 0.903” H x 1.469” V
All groups were shot using the factory laminate stock, with the stock screw torqued to 10 inch/lbs. Adjusting the torque settings is critical on the Ruger 10/22, and dramatically changes accuracy. It is important to adjust the torque setting for each rifle to minimize group sizes.
The smallest groups shot at 50 yards were shot using SK Rifle Match, shot through the Savage Mark II. The group size measured 0.286” H x 0.684” V. Velocity averaged 1008 fps.
The smallest groups shot at 91 yards were shot using the Eley Remington Match (black box), shot from the Browning T-bolt. The group measured 0.635” H x 0.6205” V. Velocity measured 1094. This should be the best ammunition for Long Range Rifle .22 matches, based on this limited test.

Notes

Accompanying this article is a spread sheet showing all the information gathered from firing the four rifles and ammunition. Bullet diameters, chronograph results, and accuracy tests are all included, as are some tests showing the results of changing the stock screw torque settings on the Ruger 10/22.
As expected, the ammunition with the smallest diameter bullets showed very little accuracy. Eley Remington Match 40 grain lead, with a bullet diameter measuring between 0.223 – 0.2235” yielded the best overall accuracy of 0.6350" H x 0.6205" V, shot at 91 yards from the Browning T-bolt. Another very good showing was the SK Long Range Match 40gr Lead, which shot into a group size of 0.755" H x 0.5045" V, at 91 yards, also shot from the Browning T-bolt. This ammunition also performed well when shot through the Ruger 10/22, shooting 0.903" H x 1.469" V at 91 yards. The bullet diameter is 0.2245 - 0.2255”.

Conclusion

This is admittedly a limited test. It does, however, demonstrate the variability of shooting multiple .22 LR loads from four different rifles.
Possibly I could have shot better groups if I had shot more groups with all ammunitions. Preferably shooting at least 5 strings would yield different results. The best groups shot from each rifle showed varying average velocities, which was interesting. All but one showed low SD and ES numbers, below 8 and 20 respectively. For factory ammunition, I think these are outstanding numbers.
For my own rifles, I will continue to test with Eley Remington Match, SK Long Range Match, and SK Rifle Match.
The worst group of performers was the four Winchester ammunitions. I will not continue shooting these rounds, other than for plinking or fouling after cleaning.
This test, I believe, highlights the importance of testing different ammunition through your rifle to obtain optimal results. Once you establish the best ammunition for your rifle, it will give you confidence when shooting for competition or hunting. Happy shooting!

Ken Bell © 2020

P.S. - I am unable to attach the spreadsheet here. If you wish to get a copy of the spreadsheet, please email me directly and I will forward it to you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ken - Thanks for sharing your test and results. Hat tip as I know how much work it takes to get this done.

As counterintuitive as it might seem, I would expect ammo/rifle combos that show show high SD to be able to sometimes produce the best (and also the worst) group sizes given enough groups shot. Somewhat like the analogy of an infinite number of monkeys eventually turning out the works of Shakespeare.
 
Ken, you have obviously put a lot of time and effort in this exercise and should give many readers food for thought. More shooters could benefit from similar efforts, which deserve applause.

There are a couple of things worth keeping in mind when comparing .22LR ammo. One of them is that variation will occur between different lot numbers of the same ammunition. Along this point, some lots of the same make and variety of ammo will perform quite differently in the same rifle. For example, two different lots of the same match ammo variety, for example Lapua CX or Lapua PB or RWS 50, may not perform the same with the same rifle.

Another thing is that, to be meaningful, data such as ES and SD must be based on a sufficiently large sample size. Too few shots in a sample means accepting a lower level of confidence in the accuracy of the results or the true performance of ammo and rifle. To have a reasonable level of confidence in the reliability of the numbers, a sample size of at least 30 is necessary. This would explain the good results obtained with Winchester Wildcat ammo, which is generally at best a plinking ammo -- an ES of 23 and an SD of 7.3. A very, very good SD in top tier .22LR match ammo would be around 5; a small ES would be anything under 20 fps.

It's refreshing to see such serious efforts in testing, despite any shortcomings that may inevitably accompany them.
 
As a long time bench rest shooter who measures groups from center to center of the two shots farthest apart... I do not understand the measurement 0.755” H x 0.5045” V.

I assume the H is the height of the group?... but I have not a clue to what V refers to. If it is the width of the group why wouldn't it be a W?
 
As a long time bench rest shooter who measures groups from center to center of the two shots farthest apart... I do not understand the measurement 0.755” H x 0.5045” V.

I assume the H is the height of the group?... but I have not a clue to what V refers to. If it is the width of the group why wouldn't it be a W?

Giving the group sizes as width by height (or vice-versa) can give a somewhat misleading view of what most shooters understand as group size. As you indicate groups are usually measured center-to-center of the two shots that are furthest apart. A group measured by width by height may not give the exact size of the group in terms of the two furthest apart groups. This is because shots in groups are not always neatly distributed.

To illustrate, a group can be squarish or rectangular or otherwise not round in shape. Measuring width by height may not necessarily reflect the diagonal distance between opposite corners. Think of Pythagorean Theorum.

If a = 3 and b = 4 then c = 5



Measuring group size by the two furthest apart shots is better than using width by height because it gives actual group size.
 
Last edited:
Giving the group sizes as width by height (or vice-versa) can give a somewhat misleading view of what most shooters understand as group size.

Measuring group size by the two furthest apart shots is better than using width by height because it gives actual group size.

I agree...
 
Measuring group size by the two furthest apart shots is better than using width by height because it gives actual group size.

I agree with that, but I also appreciate the information given in H x V measurements, especially without pictures.
 
I understand that knowing the vertical and horizontal dispersion separately when comparing ammo can be useful. My vertical dispersion varies a lot more than horizontal when comparing ammo. Of course at the end only the group size matters.
 
I suppose it was more fun than, say, beating off to reprints of old Sears Catalogs as a hobby, but probably about as useful an exercise.
Maybe a wash, as to which plays worse heck with the carpal tunnel...

Heyzoos! Just the idea of the monotony of testing 28 types of ammo in 4 essentially non-event guns makes me want to start looking for a source for catalog reprints...gah...yech!
 
As a long time bench rest shooter who measures groups from center to center of the two shots farthest apart... I do not understand the measurement 0.755” H x 0.5045” V.

I assume the H is the height of the group?... but I have not a clue to what V refers to. If it is the width of the group why wouldn't it be a W?

"V" would be for vertical.

I agree, furthest c-c would be the group size.

Horizontal and vertical dispersion is useful for figuring out issues with the rifle's consistency, not the quality of the ammo.
 
I must be, I paid my $100 for my federal gunsmithing license... now if I can just work out the h's and v's I can raise my prices...

just rasing you, for the most part you give good advice and have your heart in the right price

many would have made the same conclusion as you did

all is good
take care
 
Pr589 - apparently according to some ELS shooters, ES is often the better indicator of what might make the best groups. I agree I would think SD should be a good indicator, but that was not born out by these results.
 
Thank you for your positive comments. You are right on both counts, different lots do give different results, and yes, I probably should be shooting at least 3x 10 shot strings over the chronograph. It was simply prohibitive to do, partly because I ran out of some of the ammunition, and the cost and effort of time was also a factor. I know this is a limited test, but at this time it was all I could do.
 
guntech - I measured the size of the groups with both horizontal (H) measurements and vertical (V) measurements. Reporting the measurements could have been simplified to the largest dimension I guess, but I wanted to show both in case either horizontal or vertical stringing was apparent, which in a few cases, it was.
 
Back
Top Bottom