Beaver Skin
CGN Regular
- Location
- Lower Mainland, BC
I've posted a couple of times about pieces and parts of a project that I'm about to start and I thought that some constructive criticism would be good work out some of the finer details before I get too deep
. Differing opinions are welcomed and encouraged but please, for this to be of benefit to me and hopefully others, justify why or how you've come to your conclusions and don't just "bark and run".
We all have preferences in firearms and this could be interesting to see how and why we like what we do.
The rifle in question will be primarily for moose and large game and is ment to split the difference between my 30-06 and 375H&H. I love the 375 on game and it is wonderfully accurate and, to me, easy to shoot. However, it is heavy at 9 + a bit lbs all up for all day carry. So, to fill the gap I'm looking to put together something a bit lighter but a step up from the 30-06. I've all but decided on the 9.3x62 to fill this slot not only for its capabilities as a big game round but also its history. If I include my 45-70 into the mix all the cartridges in question would be 90+ years old, which to me is kinda neat!
The action is a ZG-47 that I already have. I'm thinking of changing the safety to one by Ed LaPour in the 3 position style. The current safety is good but I've grown up shooting M70s and their safety style to me is second nature.
I'd like this to be as weather proof as possible so a stainless barrel may be appropriate. I'm thinking about a Bevan King or Hyem barrel as I know they both have 9.3 cals available. I'm not sure about the finish. A few have piped up about Gunkote and in the US CeraKote seems more popular. I don't know which if any to use but since I like irons on a rifle, a stainless barrel and blued irons would look wrong, IMHO.
As for sights, it will wear irons - NECG?? Thoughts?? The scope I have which is a VXIII in 2.5-8X. The rings will be Talley as they fit the double square bridge on the action so no debate there.
Finally, McMillan seems to be the only manufacturer that I've spoken to who confirms that their mauser stock can easily be made to fit the ZG-47 action. I may make a wood stock later but for now, and for durability and weight, I'll be putting this in a synthetic.
So, what do you think. Any suggestions that I should still look at? Have I missed anything? I appreciate your input to this as this has been a long time in the making!
We all have preferences in firearms and this could be interesting to see how and why we like what we do.The rifle in question will be primarily for moose and large game and is ment to split the difference between my 30-06 and 375H&H. I love the 375 on game and it is wonderfully accurate and, to me, easy to shoot. However, it is heavy at 9 + a bit lbs all up for all day carry. So, to fill the gap I'm looking to put together something a bit lighter but a step up from the 30-06. I've all but decided on the 9.3x62 to fill this slot not only for its capabilities as a big game round but also its history. If I include my 45-70 into the mix all the cartridges in question would be 90+ years old, which to me is kinda neat!
The action is a ZG-47 that I already have. I'm thinking of changing the safety to one by Ed LaPour in the 3 position style. The current safety is good but I've grown up shooting M70s and their safety style to me is second nature.
I'd like this to be as weather proof as possible so a stainless barrel may be appropriate. I'm thinking about a Bevan King or Hyem barrel as I know they both have 9.3 cals available. I'm not sure about the finish. A few have piped up about Gunkote and in the US CeraKote seems more popular. I don't know which if any to use but since I like irons on a rifle, a stainless barrel and blued irons would look wrong, IMHO.
As for sights, it will wear irons - NECG?? Thoughts?? The scope I have which is a VXIII in 2.5-8X. The rings will be Talley as they fit the double square bridge on the action so no debate there.
Finally, McMillan seems to be the only manufacturer that I've spoken to who confirms that their mauser stock can easily be made to fit the ZG-47 action. I may make a wood stock later but for now, and for durability and weight, I'll be putting this in a synthetic.
So, what do you think. Any suggestions that I should still look at? Have I missed anything? I appreciate your input to this as this has been a long time in the making!





























At least I only got called a bugger this time!























