Convince me otherwise - Primary Arms Gen II 5X Compact Prism Scope ACSS

quikcolin

Regular
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Hey guys,

I’m wondering if anyone can convince me that the new Gen II 5x Prism ACSS from Primary Arms would NOT be a good option for my upcoming ATRS Modern Sporter in .223.

I plan to shoot typically between 100-300 yards. I’ve been back and forth on getting a higher magnification scope to get a better look out at 300 yards, but majority of the reviews online say 5x is plenty. I’m not looking for tight groups (I’m going to buy a T3x for that), but decent accuracy would be nice. I want to be able to “see” what I’m shooting. Purely target shooting btw (no hunting for this guy).

The value in these scopes is outstanding, the reviews seem very positive... am I missing something?

Thanks in advance,
Colin
 
I don't know anything about Primary Arms other than they seem to get a lot of good reviews, but why not just get the 1-6 variable for basically the same money? You would then need rings or a mount but the added versatility is more than worth the extra cost IMO. Weight would be basically the same as well.
 
I picked up a Vortex 3X prism scope recently and it's pretty nice all round, a 5X would not be as versatile in my opinion and I'd also suggest going 1-6 instead specially if your shooting paper.
 
Okay, I hear what you guys are saying. Going variable... but then begs the question “what zoom?” Is 1-6x enough for 100-300 yards? To answer the weight question... im not at all worried about weight. It’s going to be shooting off a bipod and rear bag almost exclusively.
 
The 1-6 is heavy so if weight is an issue.....

1-6 FFP is 17.6 Oz
1-6 SFP is 16.9 Oz
5X prism is 18.5 Oz
3X prism is 16 Oz


The prism weight includes the mount so that needs to be factored in..... but the fact is the prism scopes are not lite weight.
 
Okay, I hear what you guys are saying. Going variable... but then begs the question “what zoom?” Is 1-6x enough for 100-300 yards? To answer the weight question... im not at all worried about weight. It’s going to be shooting off a bipod and rear bag almost exclusively.

I've got a 1-8 primary arms and if I had to do it again I'd go 1-6..... at 8X the price point of these scopes starts to manifest.
The 1-6 should perform better due to using the same lens and tube sizes but with less magnification.
 
Okay, I hear what you guys are saying. Going variable... but then begs the question “what zoom?” Is 1-6x enough for 100-300 yards? To answer the weight question... im not at all worried about weight. It’s going to be shooting off a bipod and rear bag almost exclusively.

What's your definition of "accurate" shooting at those ranges? What type and size of targets are you using (steel/paper)?
 
Last edited:
Unless you REALLY need 1x, a 2-7x35 will be much better bang for the buck optically - the front lens is about twice larger in area than x24 mm objective.

Burris FF2 weighs about 12 oz, was about $120 on clearance. Vortex DB goes on sale regularly
 
What's your definition of "accurate" shooting at those ranges? What type and size of targets are you using (steel/paper)?

I echo this sentiment, what is the goal you are trying to achieve? For my goal of trying to shoot sub moa at 300 yards, a 25X is much more beneficial to me, but if I was just trying to bang a 24 inch gong, 5X might do.
 
Good question guys. If I was hitting a 10”-12” target consistently at 300 yards I would be satisfied. I’m beginning to think variable is the way to go... but which one. At what power. Is the 1-6 that much better than a 1-8?
 
Well after much soul searching I have decided. Accuracy (moderate) and optics are of importance. I don’t want to get a scope that will leave me wishing for magnification, and clarity. After reading all the reviews, the new PA 3-18x50 FFP is the ticket. Crazy value packed into this beauty. Thanks for the replies and getting me thinking.
 
Back
Top Bottom