Cooey vs Marlin 60 vs Papoose... Photo's a plenty.

mikeystew

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
51   0   0
Location
Beautiful BC
I managed to get out to the range and take some shots with 3 of my .22's because honestly i was absolutely shocked to see the groupings produced buy the SR-22 in another thread. I almost traded my Marlin 60ss for an SR before seeing that and after today im sure glad i did not.

I set up targets at 25m and 50m, 3 warm up targets at 25, 4 shot for groups at 25m, and 3 targets shot for groups at 50m.

I started with a Cooey 82 WWII army trainer (3 C broadarrow markings), followed by the 60ss, and finished with the papoose which produced the weakest results due to the fact that i did not bring the barrel nut wrench or case as i leave it assembled, and after the first group the nut started to work lose and the groups stayed crappy... hand tight doesn't cut it. In it's defense i have put several hundred rounds through it since cleaning/tightening it last. It normally groups on par with the 60ss though.

The Cooey and 60ss groups were shot with factory open sights, and the 70pss wears a 1.5-4x bushnell. CCI standard velocity was on the menu for all 3 rifles.

The rack
7481bc3d.jpg


The targetz, are 2" outer circle/square, 1" inner circle/square.
First 25m warm up, 5 shots each.
f9304480.jpg


25m shot for groups, you can see how much the papoose opened up. I fired a second group after hand tightening the barrel nut. didn't help.
44c7f3d2.jpg


50m, Cooey 82, 9 rounds... thought i shot 10.
32859059.jpg


50m, Marlin 60ss, 10 rounds. (this CCI has burned me in competition with the odd high flyer before)
31c40e47.jpg


Papoose, 50m, 8 rounds... but not it's typical grouping. I'll try again in the next couple days after a good cleaning and re-torque of the nut.
903a89c0.jpg


Honestly the Cooey and 60ss shot pretty much exactly the same as far as i can tell, with maybe a slight advantage going to the cooey at 25, and to the 60ss at 50. BUT... because everyone thinks semi auto's surely must not be as accurate as a bolt gun (which in many cases is true... not in this instance however) I give the edge and the win to... The 60ss!

Thats right... look at that heavy azz barrel. you know it looks good! And all 3 guns combined cost me about $700, which would be roughly the cost of a comparible tactical semi and a scope... Which all 3 of these guns will outshoot by a good margin.
0195f21d.jpg
 
Last edited:
I would say the old Cooey is holding its own. And who knows how many rounds have been through it, especially if it was used as a trainer!

Not bad for a 70+ year old gun! Honestly if it weren't a sacred gun I would file the front post narrower and cleaner, but I could never do that to it.
I'm always surprised how crazy accurate these cooeys are with standard velocity ammo. I really want to put a scope on my 75... That thing is a death ray with irons. I'm positive it would give a high end bolt action a run for it's money with good glass. I might have to dig out the ol' tap set tonight.
 
I have to admit, that is tighter than I expected, especially with open sights, now I'd like to see you shoot the CZ in the other post. ;)
 
Granted, I'm an evil shot:cool:
But having perfect eyesight and steady nerves from not drinking coffee and excersizing helps a lot. The idea was to show that the 60ss can keep groups equally as tight as a bolt action single shot, and people should not have to settle for mediocre accuracy just because their gun is a semi.
I attribute the 60's accuracy to a smooth rifling finish with few tool marks and a heavy barrel, a tight, dimensionally near "bentz" chamber from factory, and proven effective action design.
And of course the fact that I only ever use round nose lead lubed bullets, and only ever clean out the action and chamber... Rarely ever the bore itself. It does not need it and can hurt accuracy by destabilizing the shot to shot consistency of the bore condition.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if it was due to barrel thickness/construction/standing-alone ? :redface:

Oh you mean the Papoose? No, the group in the first pix is typical of what it normally does. It has a thin barrel sure, but the 4x scope compensates for the accuracy reduction, resulting in a gun that normally shoots identical groups to the 60ss with irons.
 
Oh boy! (rubbing hands), my cooey ace showed up today!! It might be the perfect excuse to hit the range on the way home and put it to the test beside the newly refreshed 70pss... Two guns with a combined weight under 7 lbs:) should be interesting.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom