Cool? Crazy? Better Options?

[trky chsr]

I would like to build an accurate 10/22 which for me would mean MOA or better. However I also like the tacticool look. So I would like to mount an accurate barrel/receiver on either the new ATI AR-22 stock which looks really nice and has the adjustable cheek piece or the Troy AR chassis which is aluminum and may or may not be more rigid. So do you think this would work or would I not be able to achieve my accuracy standard in this configuration? Or should I just forget it and go with the standard aftermarket barrel and target stocks. Of course I also like the new CZ Tactical trainer which in testing by Guns and Ammo staff achieved a .39" group with CCI MiniMags. Not that we'll ever be able to get one up here TC

 

[ssmedic]

I would like to build an accurate 10/22 which for me would mean MOA or better. However I also like the tacticool look. So I would like to mount an accurate barrel/receiver on either the new ATI AR-22 stock which looks really nice and has the adjustable cheek piece or the Troy AR chassis which is aluminum and may or may not be more rigid. So do you think this would work or would I not be able to achieve my accuracy standard in this configuration? Or should I just forget it and go with the standard aftermarket barrel and target stocks. Of course I also like the new CZ Tactical trainer which in testing by Guns and Ammo staff achieved a .39" group with CCI MiniMags. Not that we'll ever be able to get one up here TC

I have the Ruger 10/22 Tactical which came from the factory with a hogue overmould stock, heavy 16.5" barrel and bipod. It shoots remarkably well and prob would be your best bet. You would probably have to throw in a new trigger though...