I have used a lot of C&C bullets, particularly earlier in my hunting/shooting career.
Premium bullets were limited at the time [Partitions, Bitterroots & ?]
The premiums were often more difficult to get to shoot well also.
However, I started using John Nosler's Partitions in 1966, after I had a dramatic
bullet failure on a deer from my 308 Norma Magnum. [I did recover the deer, but
the bullet had caused a large surface wound, without penetrating the shoulder,
and had to be shot again a couple of minutes later.]
In weighing the disadvantages of premiums [cost, accuracy factors, availability]
against the advantages:[ reliable penetration from angles, reliable expansion without
disintegration, New designs that are superbly accurate, High BCs in some cases,
ability to break bone and still reach vitals], I am convinced that Premiums for hunting
are the best choice.
I have a reasonably large collection of recovered bullets at home Most are C&C
from the early days, and several of these are Jackets only
I have about 35 Premiums, representing approximately 25% of all premiums shot
and killing a game animal. The rest passed through and were not recovered.
Most of the recovered are Partitions, the bullet by which I judge all others as
far as on game performance goes.
Today, we have such a large choice of premium bullets available, that it is
completely baffling to me why anyone would not choose them, particularly for
a one-time hunt costing thousands of dollars.
Even more baffling, is the trend of using actual match bullets to hunt with, simply
because they extract a ¼ moa better groups than does the better hunting bullet.
Just because you have never had a problem, does not mean that it will never
happen. If you have the psychological strength to resist taking a shot that is less
than ideal, then C&C will probably suffice. Otherwise, the premium bullet offers
the insurance policy that all conscientious hunters want to have. Sorry for the
long ramble, but I feel strongly about this.

Dave.