CZ 550, pros and cons

bought one already.. Burris 3-9X40 BDC scope... just waiting for it to arrive..

I have a good buddy on CGN who strongly recommended a CZ. I'm kind of a Noob with center-fire, but wanted decent quality over compromise, but still value-for-dollar. I know there are other brands and models that are equal or better/less than the 550, but I have read this forum plenty to know each has it's highs and lows.

I am hoping for some insight from current or former owners what they liked or disliked.

Thanks again to all...
 
I own one CZ 550 and will probably buy more over time. Pretty happy with the accuracy, fit, finish, and the way it handles for me.

Pros - Accurate, Mauser CRF action, well made, handles well(for me).

Cons - Action was rough when I first got it, had to work it some. Some people find it heavy.
 
I had one in .30-06. For a few years it was my go to hunting rig. I found the single set trigger too light for hunting and a bit of creep in the unset posision but still better than others I own. Mine was very accurate for a hunting rifle, and I wish every now and then I never got rid of it. You should enjoy it. Good luck!
KO
 
I'd suggest the leupold rings ove the CZ ones. The CZ rings have a single screw that holds the ring to the base that clamps onto the integral base and that screw comes loose allowing the ring to spin if there is no scope mounted and allowing your scope enough play to cause horizontal stringing of groups. This makes a 1/2" group a 1/2" tall and 2" wide, really frusterating.

Great rifles tho, if the rings are tight. That set trigger is really nice for the range and the mauser claw is reliable.

JT.
 
Cz 550

jtoews80 said:
I'd suggest the leupold rings ove the CZ ones. The CZ rings have a single screw that holds the ring to the base that clamps onto the integral base and that screw comes loose allowing the ring to spin if there is no scope mounted and allowing your scope enough play to cause horizontal stringing of groups. This makes a 1/2" group a 1/2" tall and 2" wide, really frusterating.

Great rifles tho, if the rings are tight. That set trigger is really nice for the range and the mauser claw is reliable.

JT.
Click to expand...

What all is involved in changing rings for the scope? Does it require a 'smith to re-drill the mounts?
 
KO said:
I found the single set trigger too light for hunting and a bit of creep in the unset posision but still better than others I own. Mine was very accurate for a hunting rifle, and I wish every now and then I never got rid of it.
Click to expand...
Those triggers with a little polishing would remove any creep if it is present and adjust perfectly to almost any pull weight. CZ's are one of the few guns made today where you can do this.
You will find the CZ's are fast becoming a rifle with few complaints. Old world craftsmanship, blued steel in almost 100%, walnut stocks, one button quick bolt disassembly, control feed Mauser modernized, nicely polished and reasonably priced.
 
westcoaster said:
I own one CZ 550 and will probably buy more over time. Pretty happy with the accuracy, fit, finish, and the way it handles for me.

Pros - Accurate, Mauser CRF action, well made, handles well(for me).

Cons - Action was rough when I first got it, had to work it some. Some people find it heavy.
Click to expand...
westcoaster nailed it..
I personally like light wt. rifles but my CZ550FS at around 7# with out scope is is the perfect wt in a 9.3X62.. I really like the single set trigger also for off hand practice..:)

HKMark23..
I have had no problems with the full length stock in the 550..
I have a transition model FS from the 600 series to the 550 series, 525 IIRC in 30-06 that always grouped great but not in the same place day to day..
 
If you like traditional rifles, the CZ 550 is a sweet little rig. Un-set, the trigger is good but not great, the action is mauser (which is great), wood and blue speak for themselves, and accuracy is generally pretty good with anything that says CZ on it. So, for all that, you should have a nice rifle on your hands.

All that said -- personally, I'd take a lightweight stainless/synthetic rifle (or at least blued/synthetic) any day (Tikka's being my current preference). Much more practical choice for a dedicated hunting rifle -- lighter weight makes for easier packing, and a synthetic stock is a better deal for consistency of point of impact no matter the weather conditions. Oh, and you won't feel bad when you bang up a synthetic stock like you do when you tear up nice wood. :)

All IMHO, of course. YMMV.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom