CZ Bren

pc9

pc9

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
662   0   1
Location
OKANAGAN
So I’m thinking of getting one of these in NR. I was hoping to see a factory made one but looks like this won’t happen anytime soon.
What do people think of the conversion from Dlask or Rdsc. Is one better than the other?
Any real problems with them or do they run great.
$5000 is a lot of coin for a gun but it will be my only gun in 556/223 that I will keep
Let me know what people like about yours
Thanks
 
I own Dlask one no issue but some people having issue with RDSC when they did their first runs; they might have fixed it now. If CZ does get NR factory one made I would prefer that way. Not saying there are issue with either current RDSC and DLASK one. However, I have been looking into APC PRO as it has a LW barrel on it and if you're spending the same cost BT is much smoother action.

I would only wish BT has bolt release similar to AR style like how Bren 2, BT has a paddle like release.
 
Last edited:
RDSC 16" MOD2 has run flawless over here. Had both the B&T PRO and the Bren2 at the same time, Bren stayed. If making the decision keep in mind your going to need to find a handguard for a Dlask / Marstar conversion, this is another $550 and potentially a wait.
 
Tvw said:
RDSC 16" MOD2 has run flawless over here. Had both the B&T PRO and the Bren2 at the same time, Bren stayed. If making the decision keep in mind your going to need to find a handguard for a Dlask / Marstar conversion, this is another $550 and potentially a wait.
Click to expand...

Yes that’s what I’m thinking. A 16 inch one converted over to NR
 
So I think I’m going to go with a Dlask built one from a 11 inch barel.
It’s a lot of coin to spend and want it to run great
 
I'm a little confused guys, help me out. I understand why buying a non-restricted rifle was desirable, as the government didn't have the ability to track who had what, and lets face it, why would anyone trust the government with any firearms related info as they have abused it in the past and continue to.

Buying a restricted or a non-restricted these days is cataloged with the CFO and defacto, arguably the RCMP as well. So, buying the restricted then having it rebarreled and re-classified doesn't really do anything as far as the government knowing where it is, so why spend the extra $? Hunting is the only reason I can think of, and when my mind goes there, aren't there better rifles than the Bren for that sort of thing?
 
Painkillers said:
I'm a little confused guys, help me out. I understand why buying a non-restricted rifle was desirable, as the government didn't have the ability to track who had what, and lets face it, why would anyone trust the government with any firearms related info as they have abused it in the past and continue to.

Buying a restricted or a non-restricted these days is cataloged with the CFO and defacto, arguably the RCMP as well. So, buying the restricted then having it rebarreled and re-classified doesn't really do anything as far as the government knowing where it is, so why spend the extra $? Hunting is the only reason I can think of, and when my mind goes there, aren't there better rifles than the Bren for that sort of thing?
Click to expand...

NR license verification does not track the specific firearm transfered. Nor does a NR transfer number necessarily mean that a NR firearm has changed ownership. It is only a license verification mechanism.
 
The_Red_Rabbit said:
NR license verification does not track the specific firearm transfered. Nor does a NR transfer number necessarily mean that a NR firearm has changed ownership. It is only a license verification mechanism.
Click to expand...

When the verification is from a retailer, the police can compel the transaction records from that day from the retailer and check their inventory ledger they are required to maintain

Only on private verifications would there be a question of if anything changed hands and what was it
 
Brian46 said:
When the verification is from a retailer, the police can compel the transaction records from that day from the retailer and check their inventory ledger they are required to maintain

Only on private verifications would there be a question of if anything changed hands and what was it
Click to expand...

There’s no requirement to keep record of who owns the firearm after it is sold by the store. The NR might have already changed hands since being sold by store. That’s probably a big plus for a lot of people.
 
andrew3081 said:
There’s no requirement to keep record of who owns the firearm after it is sold by the store. The NR might have already changed hands since being sold by store. That’s probably a big plus for a lot of people.
Click to expand...

You know if the Nazi's want it off the street, they're coming to your place first though? Changing the barrel and classification isn't going to change that. Couple that with the cost of doing the job, I just can't make rhyme or reason for it?
 
andrew3081 said:
There’s no requirement to keep record of who owns the firearm after it is sold by the store. The NR might have already changed hands since being sold by store. That’s probably a big plus for a lot of people.
Click to expand...

Another verification is required for further transfer. There is always a paper trail to follow now is all I am saying unlike before.
 
Painkillers said:
You know if the Nazi's want it off the street, they're coming to your place first though? Changing the barrel and classification isn't going to change that. Couple that with the cost of doing the job, I just can't make rhyme or reason for it?
Click to expand...

Yea, they can come, but I sold it long time ago, so bye bye.

Lots of people like the freedom of shooting outside gun range and don’t have to deal with the transport paperwork.
And if a huge fire is heading towards your house; you can move your non restricted guns right away without any of the useless paperwork from the government.
 
Painkillers said:
I'm a little confused guys, help me out. I understand why buying a non-restricted rifle was desirable, as the government didn't have the ability to track who had what, and lets face it, why would anyone trust the government with any firearms related info as they have abused it in the past and continue to.

Buying a restricted or a non-restricted these days is cataloged with the CFO and defacto, arguably the RCMP as well. So, buying the restricted then having it rebarreled and re-classified doesn't really do anything as far as the government knowing where it is, so why spend the extra $? Hunting is the only reason I can think of, and when my mind goes there, aren't there better rifles than the Bren for that sort of thing?
Click to expand...
This thread was not started to debate what or will the government will do. If you want to start your own thread about that kind of crap go ahead.
 
andrew3081 said:
Yea, they can come, but I sold it long time ago, so bye bye.

Lots of people like the freedom of shooting outside gun range and don’t have to deal with the transport paperwork.
And if a huge fire is heading towards your house; you can move your non restricted guns right away without any of the useless paperwork from the government.
Click to expand...

It's not as easy as telling the the horse cops "buh-bye.". You'll recall that as a registered firearm owner, you've already consented to having the state check that you are adhering to storage requirements. "Buh-bye, go get a warrant" doesn't cut it my guy. You will be disappointed, 'cause they aren't going anywhere but in your house.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom