DA/SA semi auto shotgun?

faizi

Regular
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Toronto
Why not there is any DA/SA semi auto shotgun from any manufacturer in the market.
A da/sa shotgun will be as safe as a da/sa semi auto with loaded chamber.
Please share your thoughts.
 
The DA/SA trigger as found on many pistols serves no purpose. It is an answer in search of a question. Adding to the complexity of the firing system of any firearm is a bad idea. The fact that the DA/SA firing system is not found on any long gun proves the point. A firearm can only be rendered completely safe by rendering it inoperable, so there is no safety issue that the DA/SA firing system addresses. If you experience a misfire, that is not addressed by a DA/SA firing system. The fastest way to address a misfire is to cycle the action, which ejects the dud and chambers a fresh round, rather than pulling the trigger DA only to drop the hammer for a second time on the same failed primer, with predictable results. A DA revolver brings a fresh cartridge into play with each pull of the trigger, but no other type of firearm action does this.

As for the DA/SA pistol, I'm not sure why this firing system has become as popular as it is, as it makes the most difficult firearm to master even more difficult. But it is no surprise to me why 1911 style pistols are as popular as they are.
 
Yeah. Basically what Win/64 and Boomer just said. There would be no point. And it would raise prices. No one wants that.
 
ht tp://www.kbptula.ru/eng/sphu/hunt/mts255.htm

take a look at this Revolver shotgun, its made in Russia.
I am trying to see if there is a supplier here in Canada,
as I like the looks of it.
 
@Boomer,
i think you are a big fan of Glock's so called Safe Trigger thats why you are bashing DA/SA and SA triggers here.
Anyways,i asked this question not for double striking capability of DA/SA trigger but to get a safe semi auto shotgun with hammer down(DA mode)on a live chamber.
 
If there is one trigger I have little use for it is that of the Glock. Read my post again, I said making a complex firing system for any firearm is a mistake, and this is particularly true of the Glock. A firearm needs to have a trigger that releases the sear that engages the hammer or striker, and it needs to have a safety that prevents this from happening when we don't want it to. Nothing more is required. This is why there are no DA triggers on long guns. Having a trigger like a Glock's, that can't decide if it should be DA or SA, is not particularly helpful in a fight when there are other things that need your attention. Having a DA trigger is no safer than carrying the firearm cocked with the safety on or with an empty chamber. Long heavy trigger pulls are not conducive to good shooting with any firearm, and they provide no margin of safety over what we have with a simple SA trigger with a safety, so perhaps you could explain why anyone would bother.
 
As for the DA/SA pistol, I'm not sure why this firing system has become as popular as it is, as it makes the most difficult firearm to master even more difficult. But it is no surprise to me why 1911 style pistols are as popular as they are.

The DA on my S&W revolver is smooth like butter. Like night and day compared to my military DA/SA pistols. Ever tried a nice one?

And I'd worry less about blowing my leg off than carrying a condition one 1911.
 
Why not there is any DA/SA semi auto shotgun from any manufacturer in the market.

Because nobody wants one, because manufacturer builds shotguns to sell and make $$$.
 
As pointed out previously, the double action auto pistol is an answer in search of a question, as would be a shotgun with the same trigger mechanism. Safety is a characteristic of the shooter, not the gun. Gadgetry is not a substitute for proper gun handling.

I don't understand all the brouhaha with regards to carrying a pistol in condition one, considering that it is the norm with rifles and shotguns.
 
The DA on my S&W revolver is smooth like butter. Like night and day compared to my military DA/SA pistols. Ever tried a nice one?

And I'd worry less about blowing my leg off than carrying a condition one 1911.

Didn't read my first post Mike? A DA revolver makes pefect sense as each trigger squeeze brings a new round in line with the barrel. By the way, yes I have several DA revolvers, one is on my ATC. The DA pistol on the other hand is pointless, and I keep one around to prove the point.

I fail to see how a 1911 carried in condition one could accidently discharge. Even without the piece being put on safe, the gun won't fire unless the grip safety is squeezed.
 
Back
Top Bottom