Once we get some answers here can we please sticky this?
So, I've tried using the search and I've seen references in various threads but we still do not seem to have any definitive answer on this subject.
What is the legal status of taking an 8.5", 12", 14" etc. barrelled shotgun, removing the stock, and adding a pistol grip?
Most people are finding it hard to swallow that such a firearm would remain non-restricted; I am one of them. However I recall reading a post from CanAm stating that the CFC's own website states that adding a pistol grip is NOT considered "any other alteration" when referencing the regulations about reducing the overall length of a firearm. While we all know to take anything they say with a pound of salt, it is reasonable to conclude they would not publish such information without some measure of weight behind it. If nothing else it seems like good defense claiming the government themselves advised you it was okay. So...where exactly is this webpage???
I also recall reading that the Dlask-receivered 8.5" guns were reclassified to restricted, while pistol-gripped 8.5" Remington 870s that Dlask had rebarrelled themselves remained NON-restricted. Exactly the same gun with different provenances. I'm starting to see a trend here.
I would appreciate it if a knowledgable authority would weigh in on this supposition: A factory-built shotgun with an OAL under 26" is restricted. If an owner takes a factory built shotgun with an OAL over 26" and adds a pistol grip that reduces the OAL to under 26", it remains non-restricted as it does not involve sawing, cutting, or "any other alteration" by the government's definition. Yes?
So, I've tried using the search and I've seen references in various threads but we still do not seem to have any definitive answer on this subject.
What is the legal status of taking an 8.5", 12", 14" etc. barrelled shotgun, removing the stock, and adding a pistol grip?
Most people are finding it hard to swallow that such a firearm would remain non-restricted; I am one of them. However I recall reading a post from CanAm stating that the CFC's own website states that adding a pistol grip is NOT considered "any other alteration" when referencing the regulations about reducing the overall length of a firearm. While we all know to take anything they say with a pound of salt, it is reasonable to conclude they would not publish such information without some measure of weight behind it. If nothing else it seems like good defense claiming the government themselves advised you it was okay. So...where exactly is this webpage???
I also recall reading that the Dlask-receivered 8.5" guns were reclassified to restricted, while pistol-gripped 8.5" Remington 870s that Dlask had rebarrelled themselves remained NON-restricted. Exactly the same gun with different provenances. I'm starting to see a trend here.
I would appreciate it if a knowledgable authority would weigh in on this supposition: A factory-built shotgun with an OAL under 26" is restricted. If an owner takes a factory built shotgun with an OAL over 26" and adds a pistol grip that reduces the OAL to under 26", it remains non-restricted as it does not involve sawing, cutting, or "any other alteration" by the government's definition. Yes?
Last edited:





















































