Yes the 610.
I always thought the 610 was chambered for the 10mm/S&W 40
That's correct--there are no L-framed .22's. It would be an awfully bulky frame for a .22. A K-framed .22 with a full-lug barrel, like this 17-5 I used to own, could pass for a 586 or 686 unless you look awfully close, though (well, unless you looked down the barrel!).IIRC, 617s are 'K' frame while 586/686s are 'L' frame.
Believe it or not, the 6" 10-shot 617 actually weighs one ounce more than the 6" 686 (45 oz vs. 44 oz.) due to the smaller bore....and the extra weight from the 22 barrel brings the weight up very close to the 586/686 guns.
That's correct--there are no L-framed .22's. It would be an awfully bulky frame for a .22. A K-framed .22 with a full-lug barrel, like this 17-5 I used to own, could pass for a 586 or 686 unless you look awfully close, though (well, unless you looked down the barrel!).
![]()
It does look nice doesn't it? It used to be mine but I traded it a couple of years ago. I found it not that well-balanced, to be honest--too muzzle heavy. I'm much happier with my Browning Challenger.That's one sweet looking revolver. Yours?
You'd think so but I had that one on the EE asking $450 a couple of years ago with no offers for a month. It does seem, though, they're making a comeback, maybe.A nice model 17 will sell for as much or more then a 586.