Dlask Quality

transumer

transumer

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
40   0   2
Location
Toronto
Anyone familiar with their products? Barrels accurate? Feeding issues?

Anyone out there with the 12.5” barrel who can speak of its accuracy.
 
Top notch, can't speak for their 12.5" exactly, but their 16.5" is a tac driver.

I have their TUF22 and a 1911 from them, both premium items, would not hesitate buying Dlask products.
 
I live near Dlask and have been going there for near 20 years on and off. I have been happy with every product I have ever received from them. 1911s to 10/22s to their Minimoose AR (10.5”) and loved them all
 
I don’t have a Dlask 10/22 barrel, only have a Dlask receiver and a 1911.I’m pretty sure they use Green Mountain blanks which are generally regarded as excellent.I have heard a lot of good things about Dlask barrels and wouldn’t hesitate to buy one myself.

The accuracy won’t change between a 16.5” and a 12.5”. It’s the same 25” Green Mountain blank cut to different lengths. You will however loose a bit of velocity in the shorter barrel which will have a negative impact on accuracy at 50+ yards.
 
I love mine. Quality is great and trigger pull with the upgraded Ruger trigger pack is good.

rYo9Vsml.jpg


With CCI Mininmags it shoots 0.6" - 0.7" off a front rest, no rear bag at 50 yards.

I think it would do better with a higher powered scope than the PA 1-6x but for a plinker and small game carbine it's fine.

It feeds perfectly with Ruger 10 round mags. It is failing to feed under rapid fire with the 25 round DLASK mag. I think it is the angle of the cartridge in the mag not being sufficiently upwards toward the chamber and during rapid fire the cartridge is being pushed into the bottom of the breach.

I'm going to test this next time I'm at the range by shimming the back of the mag base to see if it improves the rapidfire feeding on the 25 rounder.

As much fun as the 25 round mags are I prefer the 10 rounders for carrying and hunting.

dqynuJal.jpg


There is a small range report in the post below. It was with the Tuff22 in an old jury rigged 10/22 stock (chin weld, not cheek weld) and an old 3x9x rimfire scope.

https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/1851431-Dlask-Tuf22-Scope-suggestions-please
 
Top notch quality... top notch warranty... Josef is an excellent gentleman. I have had a couple dozen Dlask builds and many 12.5" barrels, and they are every bit as accurate as the 16.5"-20" barrels, but with a different balance point and FOC stability. You won't regret purchasing from Dlask.
 
Great shorty barrels. But, yeah, heavy. You could bludgeon bears to death with it.

Or, really any large, angry animal. No need to just pick on bears.
 
Mine loves CCI standard velocity and other brands around the same velocity
Its 5 lbs with a 12.5" barrel, Leupold 2-7x28, Axiom stock and MFT minimalist butt stock.

20181220_102939.jpg
20170421_160808.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20181220_102939.jpg
    20181220_102939.jpg
    65.9 KB · Views: 129
  • 20170421_160808.jpg
    20170421_160808.jpg
    147 KB · Views: 130
coleman1495 said:
I don’t have a Dlask 10/22 barrel, only have a Dlask receiver and a 1911.I’m pretty sure they use Green Mountain blanks which are generally regarded as excellent.I have heard a lot of good things about Dlask barrels and wouldn’t hesitate to buy one myself.

The accuracy won’t change between a 16.5” and a 12.5”. It’s the same 25” Green Mountain blank cut to different lengths. You will however loose a bit of velocity in the shorter barrel which will have a negative impact on accuracy at 50+ yards.
Click to expand...

with center fire you would maybe notice but with 22 the difference in velocity is pretty much inconsequential.
your talking like 10-30 feet per second for a round traveling upwards of 1300fps with some ammo.
(1335fps for the 12" compared to 1340fps for the 16" for CCI Velocitors)
Ballistics by the inch (pretty fascinating stuff for a cold winters night reading)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom