Oh Remington, how you've gone downhill.
Legendary is right and not in a positive way.It's following up on the legendary 105cti.
Look, I'm all about weapon owners researching before they buy, and continuing to research if there are legitimate safety concerns about a given product.
But, I have yet to see convincing (scientifically founded, supported by engineering research that we can review) information indicating a problem with the Rem700 trigger design -- only a lot of hearsay and reports by people who seem to have a vested interest in a court case. I have, however, seen some pretty good studies indicating that the "problem" only seems to occur in weapons in extremely poor (even negligent) condition or which have had post-vendor work done on the trigger group.
Secondly -- do we really want to offer a disincentive to Remington and other manufacturers to issue recalls and warnings? I applaud Remington (and any other manufacturer) when they issue a timely warning and recall when they discover real safety issues.
I certainly don't ever want to contribute to anyone saying "do we really want to release this? It's a rare problem, and it will get blown out of proportion." I want them thinking "release this now -- our users have learned to trust us, and respect us when we come to them with a problem. They won't blow it up into a reason to put us out of business."
I'm guessing you didn't watch "Remington under fire" or hear the guy that designed the trigger group explain the flaw.
You probably missed the part where they showed the designers solution to the problem that at the time(40+ yrs ago iirc) would have cost 5c per rifle...that was rejected because of cost.
All supported with documentation...
I'm guessing you didn't watch "Remington under fire" or hear the guy that designed the trigger group explain the flaw.
You probably missed the part where they showed the designers solution to the problem that at the time(40+ yrs ago iirc) would have cost 5c per rifle...that was rejected because of cost.
All supported with documentation...
I saw the original program and also the rebuttal by Remington and have one question??
Why did the man that designed the trigger group say he knew early on it had a problem and suggested a fix that would cost only 5 cents. He didn't appear to me to have a axe to grind and merely spoke what he thought was the truth. He even mentioned he knew Remington were not going to be happy about his comments. Seemed like a very nice person.
The rebuttal made the original program look very bad and good on Remington to do that. However back to the question??
Why did the man that designed the trigger group say he knew early on it had a problem and suggested a fix that would cost only 5 cents. He didn't appear to me to have a axe to grind and merely spoke what he thought was the truth. He even mentioned he knew Remington were not going to be happy about his comments. Seemed like a very nice person.