I was hoping to add some rigidity to the setup. Maybe I'm over thinking this.
The rear screw only needs to be snug, not knuckle whitening tight.
It's the fron screw that does most of the work and the rear screw just keeps the rear of the receiver from wandering around.
I had a very good friend that did some experiments, using a 98 action, to determine how much effect the rear screw had on accuracy, when the receiver was tightly bedded into the stock.
He used a front pillar between the bottom metal and torqued the retaining screw to 45 in pounds, when setting up the bedding.
The rear of the receiver was allowed to establish itself in the bedding compound, without torquing the screw at all, it was only there as a guide.
If memory serves, the rifle was chambered for 257 Roberts.
That rifle was loaded well beyond book specs, 100 grain bullets at 3000fps out of a 22 in bbl.
Even then, recoil would be considered moderate.
We put well over 2000 rounds through that rifle and it maintained excellent accuracy, with only the front retaining screw.
The rear of the trigger gaurd was held in place with a wood screw. There was a piece of dowel glued into the hole for the original screw.
I don't know where that rifle went.
We were both surprised but it was by no means an original idea.
Lots of rimfire receivers are held in place with one screw and they shoot very well.
I have never repeated the above experiment and likely never will, but it was interesting at the time and showed where the work of holding and stabilizing the receiver in the stock is done, depending on the bedding.