Economical way to raise POI Swedish Rolling Block

Tudenom

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
132   0   0
Location
Prince George BC
Hey guys, I have a Swede made rolling block sporter that’s been converted to 8x58RD and I have a load that I’m comfortable with but the dang thing prints 4-5” low at 100m even withe the tall leaf up on the rear site.

I can file the front site down, but it would only leave a very short stub if my math is right.

I’m thinking about soldering on a shorter front site ramp but is there an alternate economical way to increase the point of impact without increasing load velocity? The rifle is probably regulated for a 2200 fps load and I’m using a 1500 fps load due to the action strength issue with these rifles.

It’s a $450 gun so I don’t want to drop $500 on a ladder sight and the smithing required to install it.

Thanks for the help
 
I don't know what bullet weight and profile you're using, but as an example: The difference between an 8mm 170gr rn bullet traveling 1500fps, and the same bullet traveling 2200 fps is about 3" at 100m. So...bumping up the velocity to 2200 fps would make the POI around 3" higher at 100m.

It sounds like you have the 2 or 3 position flip up style rear leaf sight, so installing a shorter front sight ramp and sight, or removing the ramp altogether and having a dovetail cut into the barrel for a dovetail front sight are the only relatively inexpensive options. The front sight ramp is likely just soldered on, so a bit of heat with a torch and it will come off. If you have the capability of sourcing a shorter ramp and soldering it on then go that route, if not then having the dovetail machined into the barrel for a dovetail front sight might be cheaper. Neither method should cost anywhere near $500 bucks.
 
If having your shots in the center of the target are important...


The cheapest way...

Put another bull on the target 4-5 inches higher. Sight on that bull and shoot, when finished shooting, remove that bull. ;-)
 
Last edited:
Further to Jakester's advice. It is possible to cut a dovetail by hand if you are careful. Finishing off with a three sided file with one side ground smooth. It takes a while, but won't cost you much. I have shortened a few barrels and done this to them. Great care is needed to keep slot level. I put barrel/action in a vise and level it then constantly check my progress...it is very easy to get tilted off.
 
I do not know if possible for you - if you want "cheap" and have a way to do yourself - and want a "longer" front sight post rather than a stub - is it possible to file down top of that front sight ramp to make it shorter, then re-cut dovetail into the ramp, then re-install the "post"??
 
If having your shots in the center of the target are important...


The cheapest way...

Put another bull on the target 4-5 inches higher. Sight on that bull and shoot, when finished shooting, remove that bull. ;-)

LOL I Like the way you think Guntech!

TBH - I was considering placing a brightly coloured letter sized sheet above the bull so I could bring the front site up to the underside and still score on the bull. But the moderators in the online competition I'm competing in (Cabin Fever Challenge) probably wouldn't be pleased, especially since I am one :)

Maybe filing the top ramp down might be an option, if I totally screw it up I could try the nuclear option and replace the ramp entirely. I'm not that great with a file, but I suppose the only way to get better is to practice right?

the whole thing has to come down about 70 thou, so it's definitely achievable with some elbow grease.

I think Jakester is right on the mark when it comes to weight and velocity, that totally makes sense to me. I could try a lighter bullet and see what happens, I think I have some jacketed round nose bullets in the 180 grain range sitting in my bullet box that I could try.
 
Hello - I had similar issues over the years. I found a flat, small piece of steel and filed a notch - then epoxied to the back of the rolling block rear sight mush higher - a new "leaf" - You can file the notch for final sighting. Sometimes I made an aperture instead of a notch. JB Weld steel almost never comes off if you clean the parts well. Sounds iffy but works and lasts.

Good luck.
 
I think Jakester is right on the mark when it comes to weight and velocity, that totally makes sense to me. I could try a lighter bullet and see what happens, I think I have some jacketed round nose bullets in the 180 grain range sitting in my bullet box that I could try.

I've included a posting from another fellow that you might find helpful.

If one of the factory spec loadings doesn't allow you to achieve the POI you want, then I would go with the lightest Spitzer bullet I could find (probably 150gr) and drive it as fast as I safely could. Otherwise, you'll likely have to do something that's already been suggested to either the front or rear sight.



Debunking 8x58R Danish Load Data for Swedish rolling block rifles

Cartridges of the World by Barnes shows incorrect Norma factory load data and grossly excessive load data for 8x58R Danish in the application of the m/1889 Swedish rolling block rifle.

There has recently been published some data for the 8x58R Danish for use in the 1889 Swedish rolling block rifle that far exceeds safe load levels. In most cases these mentioned load levels exceed .30-06 load data and we must ask if they exceed the listed chamber pressures as shown in Lyman 47th Edition Reloading manual. Considering the level loaded by Norma Precision AB was in the neighborhood of 28,000 psi and the recently published data suggests pressures in the range of 48,000 to 50,000 psi we must be very concerned in this matter.

The following data and information comes from the technical department of Norma Precision AB in Sweden.

In loading data of 30+ years ago the Norma reloading manual listed three bullet weights along with velocity and chamber pressure in psi and BAR. These loads were considered by Norma to be safe for the 1889 rolling block in 8x58R. All the information presented here conforms to these bullet weights and velocities. As the powder used by the Norma data 30+ years ago is now different I won’t include that particular powder.

159 gr at 2,477 fps for 28,660 psi
196 gr at 2,231 fps for 26,460 psi
198 gr at 2,296 fps for 28,080 psi

The tech department at Norma also sent me data from the Norwegian Vapenjournalens Ladeboken with data specifically developed for the 1889 Swedish rolling block. This more recent information coupled with the older Norma data shows a clear and consistent velocity range obtained with specific bullet weights. This late data has no chamber pressure readings which emphasizes the focus of bullet weight and velocity obtained with a specific burn rate powder.

This first text is the preface translated from Swedish:

[Begin quote]

8x58RD

The Danish military cartridge of 1889 is not a common
sight today. The Danish Krag Jörgensen rifle is rarely
used today, but the cartridge was chambered also in
Danish, Swedish and Norwegian Remington rolling block
rifles, and these are stumbled upon fairly regularly. Some
people like to shoot these old rifles, so therefore we
have included loading data for it.

Originally the cartridge was loaded with a compressed
black powder charge, awaiting the final development of
the smokeless powders. The first military cartridge had
a 14,7 g roundnose bullet, loaded to a V0 of about
485 m/s. In later smokeless loads the velocity was
increased to 620 m/s using the same bullet.

In 1908 the Danes went over to the so called "spidsskarp",
a cartridge loaded with a 12,7 g spitzer bullet where the
velocity was a claimed 750 m/s. The experience with this
cartridge was, however, that it was too powerful for the
rolling block rifles, and a reduced charge load using the
Dane bullet was developed for these rifles.

Until the 1960's, Norma made a factory load in 8x58RD
using a 12,7 g soft point and a claimed velocity of 680 m/s,
with respect due to the many rolling block rifles being used
for hunting in Sweden. Norma also made a batch of M1908 spidsskarp for Denmark, using these same figures.

The loads presented here are being held to the same
levels, and can be used in both Krag-Jörgensen and
rolling block rifles. Original cases uses Berdan primers,
but new boxer primed cases are available from Bertram.
Loading dies are available from RCBS.

[end quote]

Next is the technical data of the test weapon and comparison loads. Pay attention to the two factory loads.

[begin translation]

Test weapon; Carl Gustaf Remington Rolling Block 1872/93
(m/1867-89 converted in 1893. Obviously a military rifle, but no further
clues to whether sporterized or original. Barrel length suggests the
latter.)
Barrel length - 85 cm / 33"
Rifling twist - 1-9 ½" / 1- 241 mm
Rifling dia. - .323" / 8,20 mm
Case - Bertram
Primer - Remington 9 ½
Maximum case length - 58,0 mm
Trim-to length - 57,8 mm
Factory ammunition chronographed in test weapon -
--Norma 12,7 g (196 gr) Alaska 2,234 fps / 681 ms -
--Norma manufactured M1908 Spidsskarp (spitzer)
(D Mantel type bullet) 12,7 g 2,283 fps / 696 ms

(Bracketed comments by the translator)
[end translation]

The actual load data from Vapenjournalens Ladeboken:

196 grain Sellier & Bellot soft point bullet .323" diameter:

Norma N135 43 grains 2,196 feet per second
44 grains 2,244 feet per second

Norma N140 45 grains 2,144 feet per second
46 grains 2,230 feet per second

Cartridges of the World by Barnes has long been used as a source of information and as such it’s a fine reference. But COTW is not a loading manual with a laboratory behind it nor is any of the load data referenced to anyone or anyplace to check the veracity of the data. Clearly their inclusion of Norma factory load velocities is wholly incorrect as cited by the above chronographed loads from verified sources and supplied to me by the technical department of Norma Precision AB.

As an added note-- There was recently a rolling block failure in Sweden that resulted in the death of the shooter. The receiver came apart. I don't have the details yet. It may have been a 1867 rifle in 12,7x44R but I'm not sure. Rolling block rifles are not unbreakable.

Dutchman
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom