It was the style, leftover from forever but with a purpose. Lee Enfield No.4s need pressure points along the barrel to get the vibration harmonics right. There is no such thing as a free-floating Lee Enfield barrel; out of the factory, they had a few pounds of down force against the tip of the fore-end. As the rifle bucks and flexes under recoil, the barrel whips up inside the stock.
Try reading again about the Enfield No4's, they were made with a free floating barrel.
Try reading again about the Enfield No4's, they were made with a free floating barrel.
Hmm, but the armorers' literature do indicate that an upward pressure at the muzzle (well right behind the front sight guard anyways) of some... what was it, 3 to 7 pounds, or something like that? So, would "Free Floating" still be valid since all the barrel, save from that single pressure point, is indeed free of all contact?
Not to derail this thread though. My hypothesis (prevent the soldier from burning his hands, grabbing the rifle with one hand on the barrel) - anyone can support this? It's just an hypothesis.
Lou



























