Enfield help, What do I have? Lots of Pics

Fremen

Moderator
Moderator
Rating - 100%
87   0   0
Location
Ottawa On.
So got this No1 Mk3 awhile back on a trade.

Never really took a good look at it until a couple weeks ago..
It is a little different then your normal

Larger Images can be found here


IMG_0419.JPG

IMG_0421.JPG

IMG_0422.JPG

IMG_0423.JPG

IMG_0424.JPG

IMG_0425.JPG

IMG_0426.JPG

IMG_0427.JPG

IMG_0428.JPG

IMG_0430.JPG

IMG_0431.JPG

IMG_0432.JPG

IMG_0433.JPG

IMG_0434.JPG

IMG_0435.JPG

IMG_0436.JPG

IMG_0437.JPG

IMG_0438.JPG

IMG_0439.JPG

IMG_0440.JPG

IMG_0441.JPG
 
Last edited:
Thats a fine rifle!!! The barrel is stamped BSA BURNISHED, meaning it has a ball burnished barrel if I'm not mistaken? If headspace and bedding are correct it should make a fine shooter!
 
Just saw the AGP PARKER Stamp on the reciever. You have at target rifle set up to the highest standards of the day. I also have one that is a longbranch and is probably the most accurate gun I've ever shot!!
 
Civilian market SMLE target rifle that has been treated badly and is missing the rear handguard.

Does the bolt match, from the condition I'm thinking it doesn't?

And what's all the scaring around the bolt head on the recoil lug of the bolt?

Interesting that the A G Parker mark on the barrel has been overstruck with the BSA mark.

The Enfield examiner's mark on the receiver and breech probably means it was taken into service of some kind in WWII, probably for training only. That would also explain the second serial number stamped above the original.
 
Last edited:
Note the flat faced crown - typical on target rifles.
If you disassemble it (remember the butt comes off before the forend) you may find that the bedding has been reworked.
A Parker Hale 5A or other micrometer rear sight would be appropriate.

The rifle needs a careful cleaning; looks as if it has a lot of potential.
 
I did remove the rear handguard to be able to take the pictures.

It does not appear to have been fitted with a different rear sight then the one it has.

The bolt does not match and has a bit of pitting.

I have yet to shoot it.
 
Note the flat faced crown - typical on target rifles.
If you disassemble it (remember the butt comes off before the forend) you may find that the bedding has been reworked.
A Parker Hale 5A or other micrometer rear sight would be appropriate.

The rifle needs a careful cleaning; looks as if it has a lot of potential.

Doesn't the butt come off after the forend? Otherwise the square end of the butt bolt will either gouge the the square socket on the forestock or crack it?
 
You're right, forend first.

The target rear sight was mounted using the rear trigger guard screw and safety spring screw positions. No alterations to the rifle are required.
 
As noted, a Parker match build (by AG Parker - AJ Parker was his son,). The ball burnished barrel was produced by forcing a series of steel balls down the bore to create a perfectly smooth surface on the lands. Check the barrel at the muzzle by placing the bullet of a loaded round, tip first into the muzzle - if it gets 'eaten' by the barrel, then the barrel is suffering from erosion at the muzzle. The bedding may consist of hardwood or steel (Indian bedding) blocks positioned to provide support to the barrel in specific locations. The bedding of these rifles is an art in itself. These rifles were generally prepared for the Service Rifle match, which in the old days involved shooting at targets out to 1,000 yards using iron sights - they can be amazingly accurate at distance, in some cases better at long distance than intermediate distance. Similar conversions were done to the No4 rifle, but they are generally not as accurate at 1,000 yards as the No1 MkIII. It is incidentally possible that the rifle "left the factory" as it were in that configuration - Parker did a lot of work directly for BSA, such as the BSA aperture sights.
 
Last edited:
It STARTED as a commercial BSA-made SMLE Mark III*. These were identical to the military model but made strictly for the commercial market and thus fitted and finished, generally, to a very high standard.

It was then reworked by A.G. Parker, who applied his BALL BURNISHED marking over top of the BSA marking, NOT the other way around.

Ball Burnishing was done after a barrel was fitted and finished. It consisted of forcing a specially-made, very precise, super-hard, lubricated steel ball down the bore of the rifle. This smoothed-out any and all irregularities, tool-marks and such from the tops of the Lands. From what I have seen of Ball-burnished barrels, I have a sneaking suspicion that they also id some diamond-lapping on the things, for they were/are marvellously smooth.

For long-range DCRA competitions, you generally figured 300 rounds of Mark VII Ball ammo, the hot, Cordite stuff, before a barrel was lapped-in enough that you could get the best accuracy out of it. PROBLEM was that this also ate into your Leade and that ran your accuracy downhill. This disappeared with a Ball-burnished barrel and you could shoot them in competitions with only a dozen rounds through them. I have seen a number of "possibles" shot at 800 and 900 yards with brand-new Ball-burnished barrels. They were really the Cat's Meow.

Interesting that in the early 1960s you could pick up a surplus SMLE for as little as $8.50 (I still have one), with fairly decent ones going for $12 and very shootable as-is, right out of the barrel or the open crate on the floor. BSA was still producing the very last commercial rifles, or had, only a few years before, and Parkers' could get $100 for a tuned rifle. If you wanted just the Ball-burnished barrel for your rifle, Parkers' would sell you that, too, but it would set you back $60. I was working fulltime in a bakery and making $28 a week, gross pay, with taxes coming out of that, so that wonderful barrel was worth 2 weeks-plus of my pay, or a week and a half for a journeyman Carpenter, nearly a week for a guy working the rigs in 40 below, soaking-wet with salt-water and half-deaf from the Jimmies. But anyone who shot one would swear by it, make no mistake. Likely they were some of the finest, most accurate .303" barrels ever made, anywhere.

Be very careful with this rifle. I you take it apart, likely you will find strips of thin CORK inside the fore-end, taking up space and correcting the bedding to closest tolerances. As well, it is possible that the Reinforce at the Nose Cap may have been cut back to 1 inch from the specified 2 inches; some rifles shot better like that. And it is even possile that the stock might have had the Reinforce cut back to 1 inch and then RESTORED to 2 inches with Cork stripping! ANYTHING is possible when dealing with a former Match rifle.

One point: if your screws are done up tight in the prescribed manner and the thing will not shoot under 2 inches (and likely closer to a half-inch with that barrel)...... or it if shoots erratically, all over the place, then it is likely that the woodwork has developed The Damned Crack. It is at the BACK END of the Forestock, just where the Sear goes down through the wood to make contact with the Trigger. IF it develops The Damned Crack, you degrease, glue with a GOOD 2-part non-shrinking epoxy, clamp lightly for 24 hours, trim and reassemble the rifle, head for the range.

Whoever owned this rifle originally was dead SERIOUS about shooting the best targets possible. Without doubt, they would have been a DCRA shooter. If this rifle won any serious Matches, the DCRA still should have a record if it by number and owner. Well worth checking out, I would think.

A truly FINE Toy!
 
Wow I am getting more and more excited about this rifle.
I thought I did OK on the trade looks like I did Really well.

Anyone in the Ottawa area about to help me clean her up?

Also how would I go about looking it up through the DCRA and finding the correct rear sight?
 
Back in the day. for the princely sum of one shilling and sixpence, you could have your rifle inspected and duly certified by a factory inspector that it complied to military specifications. Thus, allowing a commercial built rifle to be used in service rifle competitions.

That is what the second serial number (861.F) and the (Enfield?) inspector mark denote.
 
Last edited:
Back in the day. for the princely sum of one shilling and sixpence, you could have your rifle inspected and duly certified by a factory inspector that it complied to military specifications. Thus, allowing a commercial built rifle to be used in service rifle competitions.

That is what the second serial number (861.F) and the (Enfield?) inspector mark denote.

I have examined examined commercial Sniders, Martinis and Long Lees with the govt view mark showing that it conformed to service specs. The 1912 Westley Richards catalogue lists their new Long Lees as being "government viewed and marked".
 
Back in the day. for the princely sum of one shilling and sixpence, you could have your rifle inspected and duly certified by a factory inspector that it complied to military specifications. Thus, allowing a commercial built rifle to be used in service rifle competitions.

That is what the second serial number (861.F) and the (Enfield?) inspector mark denote.

This is same examiner's mark found on the No4(T)s. I don't think that means anything except that it is the same mark though. Do you know anything about how and to whom marks were assigned between the wars?
 
Back
Top Bottom