Steve I am not suggesting it does, directly take a load, other than the torque from loading and unloading the firearm. The 1 I saw that had bad things happen looked like it had shattered directly behind the lugs, and disintegrated enough that the lugs also blew back at the shooter. The action itself looked basically undamaged.
I would venture there were many factors at work here, and all of which we will never know, other than the ruling was " if the bolt had not been modified, blah blah"
As you are probably very aware , getting liability insurance in our line of business is difficult and PRICEY. I choose to not look for litigation more than I have to, so choose to let you do these types of modifications. Same for the installation of AR and Sako extractors in 700 bolts. There are 2 definite lines here as well , those who will and those of us who do not believe it to be a prudent modification :mrgreen: