Hi,
I bought a Savage Lee Enfield No4 Mk1* in the 93C###x serial range (1944) that when thru FTR in 1952 (No4 Mk1*/3). I just looked at it parts by parts and I'm suprised to see that all parts are Fazakerley with the exception of only the reciever, the front sight blade and the middle stock band!! Also, the bolt and forend (both Fazakerley as mentionned before) were serialized to the reciever! The only other exception is a Long Branch mag body (has a Fazakerley follower).
My questions are:
- During the FTR process, was it standard to serialize the stock and bolt?
- How come, that rifle wasn't throwned away since all parts where changed?
- Is it possible that it was assembled in England after the shut down of the Savage plant in 1944 (not likely since over 100,000 additional recievers were manifactured by Savage from the 93C series to the end of production)?
Other than that, the previous owner bought the rifle in perfect condition as surplus in the 50's.
Thanks for the help.
I bought a Savage Lee Enfield No4 Mk1* in the 93C###x serial range (1944) that when thru FTR in 1952 (No4 Mk1*/3). I just looked at it parts by parts and I'm suprised to see that all parts are Fazakerley with the exception of only the reciever, the front sight blade and the middle stock band!! Also, the bolt and forend (both Fazakerley as mentionned before) were serialized to the reciever! The only other exception is a Long Branch mag body (has a Fazakerley follower).
My questions are:
- During the FTR process, was it standard to serialize the stock and bolt?
- How come, that rifle wasn't throwned away since all parts where changed?
- Is it possible that it was assembled in England after the shut down of the Savage plant in 1944 (not likely since over 100,000 additional recievers were manifactured by Savage from the 93C series to the end of production)?
Other than that, the previous owner bought the rifle in perfect condition as surplus in the 50's.
Thanks for the help.
Last edited: