Full-auto/Suppressors or Integrated ATT/No Shooting Restrictions

Full-auto/Suppressors or Integrated ATT/No Shooting Restrictions?

  • Full-auto/Suppressors

    Votes: 58 14.8%
  • Integrated ATT/No Shooting Restrictions

    Votes: 334 85.2%

  • Total voters
    392
Damn, you weren't supposed to see that. :D

It may not have been my money, but it was still expensive. I think you just didn't want to hold onto the AR that was glowing red in a number of spots. Or breathe all the crap being thrown back from the breech.;)

Yes is was quite expensive. :( I have done that test three times and as you discovered it is not nearly as fun as one would imagine. FA suppressed should be fun but that particular test is just nasty and unpleasant. Hence the reason I was looking for an unsuspecting victim. ;)

I am certainly not complaining, but for the poll question, the lifting of range only restrictions on restricted firearms is much, much bigger overall. As I said, I would prefer all guns were treated equally and that everything was legal, including suppressors.

While my interests tend towards suppressors I am onboard with treating all guns equally hence the comment about this being a crappy poll question. I am also a 12/x prohib owner who would really like to be able to take my legally owned and registered firearms out to shoot.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom