Gene Davis Optical Booster Review

Mystic Precision

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 99.9%
1082   1   1
Location
Summerland, BC
Posting here instead of the optics forum as it applies directly to precision/competition shooters.

I just got an optical booster from Gene Davis (winning US BR 'smith). The purpose is to increase scope magnification without the cost of traditional permanent scope lense changes.

These products either screw or slip onto the eyepiece of the scope and act just like a magnifying glass. Made with Zeiss lenses, there is zero distortion added to your view. Gene says these are 'eyeglass' grade - meaning as good as it gets.

For my Elite 4200 6x24 AO scope, I bought a slip on style (eyepiece is not threaded). Comes with a rubber tube housing the lense. Looking through the lense at printed text, it most certainly magnifies the image and there is no visible distortion.

I only used it briefly on my scope and the initial impression is a much 'larger' image. The field of view remains the same (determined by the scope NOT this lense). Everything just looks BIGGER - a very nice view. No change in resolution, colour, brightness - completely neutral.

At $129US shipped, it is a dirt cheap way to increase your scope magnification WITHOUT reducing your field of view, making the image dimmer, loosing some image resolution, changing your reticle subtention - mil dot, increasing edge distortion, increasing size or bulk of the scope, changing any part permanently, buying very specific end use scopes for big bucks.

The screw on style are a bit cheaper ($104US me thinks) but don't boost as much as the slip ons. The screw on's boost approx 25%. The slip on's up to 40%.

My 24X now becomes a 30 to 34X. Boosts the entire range of my variable scope. In essence, my 6x24 becomes a 8.5 - 33.5X.

A 36X would become a 45 to 50X scope!

I am very impressed with how well this simple device works. I will be spending much more time to see how best to utilise this product. It does require a change in the focus of the scope - a simple job.

Jerry
 
mystic....
as always, a good review. Are you satisfied it is a worthy tool?
I am saving for a 4-14 Menace to replace my 10x Elite on my 300Rum. Would Davis's Booster be a 'decent' investment for L.R.H.? Is the Booster a "one size fits all", with the slip on style?

Thanks for your time,
LeRoy
 
I bought one Jerry, loooong ago when I was waiting for the damn scope to show up. :mad: Still never did so I bought a 12X-42X Nightforce from peterdobson, in stock and to my door in 2 days. :cheers:

I'd sell my UNUSED booster with the rubber adapter for $130 shipped if anyone is interested. Its made for the Leupold but this one also has the rubber adapter which I think fits pretty much everything.
 
The rubber eyepiece will stretch to fit a variety of eyepieces but certainly, not for EVERY scope. Contact Davis for range of sizes and possible other fitments. I would say that for the common eyepieces, should fit fine.

Yes, I think this would be a very inexpensive way to get more mag which can prove useful in LRH. However, it will not make the image any clearer - JUST BIGGER.

So if you are having issues with the clarity and resolution of your optics, you will simply get more of the same.

However, it is a much cheaper way of getting mag over 24X AND still getting decent optics. Lots of 14 to 24X scopes with excellent glass for decent costs. Boosting these would be way cheaper then buying a higher mag Leupold, NF or whatever.

You still need to turrents to work no matter the price.

Jerry
 
Sorry, but the booster maxes out at 40% of orig mag so a 10X would max out at 14X. Still a solid improvement but the total costs, you can get a 16X super sniper and end up with better optics to boot.

Jerry
 
Again, not long "behind the wheel" so this is not indepth, however, the initial take is that the eye relief is about the same FROM the back of the booster.

The image is proportionally larger so scale stays the same.

Take a magnifying glass and hold it over newsprint. That is pretty much the image change you get. Everything in the lense field of view is simply larger. It does not change the image as viewed through the scope.

Will spend more quality time with this gidget ASAP and post more thoughts.

So far, I am impressed.

Jerry
 
Spent a nice lunch time with the booster and here are my findings:

PROS:
Image quality is excellent - what your scope had before, stays the same
Mildot scaling stays the same as both the image AND reticle are made larger
No field of view loss or edge blurring - lense is wider then eyepiece glass.
Colour and light neutral - no change to what your scope had.

Does make image significantly bigger which is like higher magnification.

CONS:
Eye relief is reduced quite a bit so this is not for hard recoiling rifles. Even free recoil shooters may have to watch.
Eye position becomes more critical but similar to high mag target scopes
Parallax is more sensitive then parent scope but again, similar to high mag scopes. When the focus is properly adjusted for the reticle, parallax is very small.
You cannot take off booster then continue to use the scope. Reticle focus is grossly changed and will be blurry without the booster.
Adj Objective/parallax setting may not be the same with the booster however, image quality is retained.

Test scope is my Elite 4200 6x24AO w/mildot that I use on my F class rifle. Will test prone next as it comes very close to touching me when firing off a bench.

For target and varmint shooters who want more mag without excessive costs while shooting low recoil rifles, this is a very nice product.

Not ideal if going to be in the rain/snow as it might fog between lense and scope eyepiece - unsealed, or under 'hard' useage as the attachment is not very strong - slip fit.

It is not a device that can be put on in the field to boost magnification as needed. The reticle focus would be way off needing some mucking about.

No idea what scratch coating are on the lense so best to be treated with care.

Jerry
 
Interesting initial review Jerry.
I have a beloved older B&L 4-16X50 (1/4 minute) that would be perfect for this....My eyes like a bit more than 16X these days!

I thought about my parallax question and I think the amplified error is actually a good thing so long as the GD is magnifying the scope error and not inducing further parallax.....Some quick field testing would sort this out.

The only contact info I could find was as listed below. Is there a web site ?

gdavis10@columbus.rr.com
Gene Davis Pleasantsville Ohio 43148
740-468-2232
 
Back
Top Bottom