bluemike807
CGN Regular
- Location
- Eastern Ontario
Not too long ago I posted about the sporter. No4 Mk1 I picked up. Well, I got it cleaned up some, refinished the furniture with BLO, and Im hoping, in the future, to de-sporterize the stock, but in the meantime, I'd just like to get used to it.
Holy crap does it kick. I've shot a .308 but I wasn't prepared for the punch in the shoulder this bastard gives. The steel butt plate should have been a good indicator that I was in for some punishment. When I shot at the range, I traded a shot with another guy there who had an SKS. That 7.62x39's recoil was like a stiff breeze. Meanwhile, the other guy, as soon as he fired let out a yell and a 'aaaaarghh... F**K!". That'll learn him.
Im a newcomer to shooting sports, so I wasn't terribly surprised when I didn't do so well at 100yards. I put 10 rounds downrange, and two of them hit a 8" paper target. Not even close to where I was putting my post. I've got pinch and pull rear sights - I tried with both the 'battle' sight, and the lowest notch (not marked but its got to be about 100m calibration) and - no dice.
I hit the 50yd range, and 8 rounds later, had the same result.
Now, just to reiterate, when I bought the rifle, the storekeeper told me it had been given a cursory cleaning. I improved on this, inside and out. I dont have any experience with vintage rifles, so when I looked at the bore when I first got it, there wasn't much to see. Its a 2-groove barrel, and I figured, with age and an older design, maybe there wasn't much TO see.
I gave it a quick clean before I took it to the range, just to make sure any really big chunks were gone. I thought I'd done a decent job.
Yeah right. I burned about 20 patches last night cleaning the damn thing, and more than half my solvent. Now the bore was much cleaner, and the grooves are deep and sharp. That said, I still wasn't satisfied, so I bought a wire brush and gave it a few runs through. It was as if someone had poured powdered lead into the barrel. Now, I dont think this thing was cleaned from the day it was issued to some Tommy 60 years ago!!
Another 20 patches later, its stopped giving up lead. The bore is a mirror, and the rifling could cut glass. I really hope this will help accuracy.
Ok. The point of this thread - how the hell do I sight this thing. The sights are for meters; no problem there, I suppose, as long as I remember the imperial/metric equivalencies. The foresight however has a huge post - the tip of which is almost 3/4" higher than the muzzle. Im guessing I put most of my rounds yesterday well over the target.
For those of you who have shot Enfields - whats the rule of thumb for targetting? Do you think the crappy state of the bore was a factor in its apparent inaccuracy? What else can I do to keep lead build up down - and will using the wire brush repeatedly mess with the barrel?
Thanks!
Holy crap does it kick. I've shot a .308 but I wasn't prepared for the punch in the shoulder this bastard gives. The steel butt plate should have been a good indicator that I was in for some punishment. When I shot at the range, I traded a shot with another guy there who had an SKS. That 7.62x39's recoil was like a stiff breeze. Meanwhile, the other guy, as soon as he fired let out a yell and a 'aaaaarghh... F**K!". That'll learn him.
Im a newcomer to shooting sports, so I wasn't terribly surprised when I didn't do so well at 100yards. I put 10 rounds downrange, and two of them hit a 8" paper target. Not even close to where I was putting my post. I've got pinch and pull rear sights - I tried with both the 'battle' sight, and the lowest notch (not marked but its got to be about 100m calibration) and - no dice.
I hit the 50yd range, and 8 rounds later, had the same result.
Now, just to reiterate, when I bought the rifle, the storekeeper told me it had been given a cursory cleaning. I improved on this, inside and out. I dont have any experience with vintage rifles, so when I looked at the bore when I first got it, there wasn't much to see. Its a 2-groove barrel, and I figured, with age and an older design, maybe there wasn't much TO see.
I gave it a quick clean before I took it to the range, just to make sure any really big chunks were gone. I thought I'd done a decent job.
Yeah right. I burned about 20 patches last night cleaning the damn thing, and more than half my solvent. Now the bore was much cleaner, and the grooves are deep and sharp. That said, I still wasn't satisfied, so I bought a wire brush and gave it a few runs through. It was as if someone had poured powdered lead into the barrel. Now, I dont think this thing was cleaned from the day it was issued to some Tommy 60 years ago!!
Another 20 patches later, its stopped giving up lead. The bore is a mirror, and the rifling could cut glass. I really hope this will help accuracy.
Ok. The point of this thread - how the hell do I sight this thing. The sights are for meters; no problem there, I suppose, as long as I remember the imperial/metric equivalencies. The foresight however has a huge post - the tip of which is almost 3/4" higher than the muzzle. Im guessing I put most of my rounds yesterday well over the target.
For those of you who have shot Enfields - whats the rule of thumb for targetting? Do you think the crappy state of the bore was a factor in its apparent inaccuracy? What else can I do to keep lead build up down - and will using the wire brush repeatedly mess with the barrel?
Thanks!