Glock 21sf VS Sig 220R

JB

JB

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
111   0   0
Location
Ontario
Ok guys tell me whats good and bad about the glock21sf and the sig220R and what gun you would want and why is it better then the other one
 
Is the SF not a smaller frame? I would say my 220r is not for small hands but I would say not a bunch different than my 85C or Jericho. Also there is the big difference in polymer and steel frame. I like both.
 
JB said:
I have heard that getting parts for sig i very hard
Click to expand...

I've never needed any parts for my SIGs beside replacement springs which are fairly commons (Wolverine supplies, Questar, local shops...).

I would pick up the P220 any day vs a G21, especially in if you get a steel frame. Beside the HK45, I'm not a big fan of polymer 45s.
 
GunGuy34 said:
G21 sf is ten times the gun at half the price.
Click to expand...

I own the Glock and owned a P220 in the past (and own 2 Sigs right now) - but I don't understand how the Glock is 10x the gun that the Sig is.
The only thing I can think of the Glock having is increased durability (maybe), and a higher capacity in a free country.
 
mr00jimbo said:
I own the Glock and owned a P220 in the past (and own 2 Sigs right now) - but I don't understand how the Glock is 10x the gun that the Sig is.
The only thing I can think of the Glock having is increased durability (maybe), and a higher capacity in a free country.
Click to expand...

Durability, reliability, warrenty work ( police ornance). After market parts everwhere. Its just a better gun. But i am biased. Plus even in Canada Glocks carry two more rounds. Pretty sure 220 mags are 8 rounders.
 
Have you handled a Glock 21 Gen 4? Without any backstrap on it, I prefer that gun to the 21 SF. Nothing wrong with the Sig, but they are pricier than the Glock.
 
Of the two, the Glock would be my choice.

1. The Glock 21s (either SF or Gen 4) seem to be so far unaffected by the problems encountered in other Glocks since the introduction of the Gen 4.
2. SIGs have suffered from quality problems, particularly with small parts, in the last few years. I believe their high cost is no longer justified.
3. The .45 version of the P220 has historically been the least durable and reliable member of the P22X family.
4. I don't see any compelling reason to choose a DA/SA gun over a striker-fired one when starting from a clean slate.

The S&W M&P 45 is also worth considering.
 
I have handled many Glocks and never has felt as good in my hand as my SIG P220 in 9mm. Both have great reputations for durability. I have owned my SIG for 8 years and never replaced a single failed part. That being said i had probably only sent 500rds/year down it. I finally torn it down for a complete clean and inspection and saw nothing but normal wear from all the abuse it took.

Face it you will eventually get both so pick the one you like more at this moment in time.
 
crazydsb said:
I have handled many Glocks and never has felt as good in my hand as my SIG P220 in 9mm. Both have great reputations for durability. I have owned my SIG for 8 years and never replaced a single failed part. That being said i had probably only sent 500rds/year down it. I finally torn it down for a complete clean and inspection and saw nothing but normal wear from all the abuse it took.

Face it you will eventually get both so pick the one you like more at this moment in time.
Click to expand...

500 rounds/year is abuse? :) ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom