redleg said:We break lots here at the range, but keep in mind that they get very high round counts. They are not indestructable, and they are not the most durable handgun on the market. They are however reliable and relatively inexpensive. As such they represent good value.
NAA said:redleg said:We break lots here at the range, but keep in mind that they get very high round counts. They are not indestructable, and they are not the most durable handgun on the market. They are however reliable and relatively inexpensive. As such they represent good value.
Okay, what is the 'most durable handgun on the market'? :?:
redleg said:NAA said:redleg said:We break lots here at the range, but keep in mind that they get very high round counts. They are not indestructable, and they are not the most durable handgun on the market. They are however reliable and relatively inexpensive. As such they represent good value.
Okay, what is the 'most durable handgun on the market'? :?:
The guns that have lasted the longest without frame or slide failures are the 1911s (we use Kimber, but I'm sure most would last as long), and the SIG P226. The CZ75 also gives really good service, but I haven't run enough to make a general statement about them.
P99s have been problematic with lots of small parts and barrels breaking, so I haven't yet been able to run enough rounds through one to destroy a frame or slide. Not sure what this says.
capp325 said:I'm pretty sure that redleg means malfunctions that require repair. I doubt people would report (and TSE would record) every minor stoppage that occurs with a rental gun. Also, I'm not sure how redleg compiles his statistics on how long the gun "lasts". Do you actually count the exact number of rounds that goes through each gun or do you simply look at how long (i.e. number of months/years) it takes for the gun to require repairs? The later method is obviously not very reliable, because if gun A is rented three times as frequently as gun B, it is only natural that it would require repairs sooner.