What about a lightweight TSX or NP from a smaller bore at high velocity for deer? I generally use C&C for deer but do have some 110gr TTSX for my 270. Another similar would be a TSX from a 22/250 for deer.The most experienced game shooter I know (edit, ha! He heard the call and showed up above me), and a well known member of this site (even the vast majority of hunting celebrities will not have dropped as much large game, I hadn't realized the extent of it till we talked) has long argued the point overly hard bullets are less effective. He has a very strong point. TSXs have their place, when you want to shoot right through something big, but by and large will be less effective than a softer, lead core bullet. That doesn't mean TSXs and the like aren't lethal, they absolute are, but more game is bound to drop where it is or travel less with a softer bullet, this is true even for larger animals up to the threshold of the big bovines it would appear on vitals hits (bone is different). I started seeing this as I moved to cheap interlocs from TSXs for everything in .375, there is a difference. Now, I still load and use TSXs, I like no lead for meat my kids eat, and they work swell, but I'd opine they're behind softer bullets on everything we have in Canada with the possible exception of bison.
What about a lightweight TSX or NP from a smaller bore at high velocity for deer? I generally use C&C for deer but do have some 110gr TTSX for my 270. Another similar would be a TSX from a 22/250 for deer.
What I found most interesting was that it seemed to indicate every shot "greater than" 150 yards resulted either in a miss or an un-recovered deer. So either they were all poor shooters, or, the few shots over 150 had some buck fever influence, or just maybe, getting proficient out to that range on something other than paper is a little tougher than most (eastern) hunters realize.
The Partition is actually a soft bullet, expanding violently and often shedding half its weight at close range. The difference it has a back-up plan, just in case.
That's true, so I rephrase from "TSX or NP" to TSX/TTSX or similar monometals in my question.
The .270 can get some decent speeds out of a 110 TTSX, but no more than a .270 Weatherby, or 7mm STW will do with heavier bullets, no more than .257 Weatherby or .264 Win will do with similar weights, and not anywhere near what is possible with light bullets. 3950 fps MV with a 80 grain TTSX is as far as I've taken a mono, and even at that its still no match for some disgustingly ordinary bullets.
That's not to say monos are useless, or inadequate, or even that they aren't better for some things. Its just that dropping deer sized animals as fast as possible isn't one of them.
Depends whether you want it to fall over and die, or die then fall over. Shoulder, high shoulder and frontals will give fast drops more often than not. It doesn't take long for an animal to hit the ground when his legs quit working, and dieing will take care of itself. On the other hand the same animal can cover a lot of ground in a very short time if it can stay on its feet.
The .270 can get some decent speeds out of a 110 TTSX, but no more than a .270 Weatherby, or 7mm STW will do with heavier bullets, no more than .257 Weatherby or .264 Win will do with similar weights, and not anywhere near what is possible with light bullets. 3950 fps MV with a 80 grain TTSX is as far as I've taken a mono, and even at that its still no match for some disgustingly ordinary bullets.
That's not to say monos are useless, or inadequate, or even that they aren't better for some things. Its just that dropping deer sized animals as fast as possible isn't one of them.
I prefer the original & best mono-metal projectile....Lead. When sized & loaded to "disgustingly" low speeds to suit the game intended, the only factor for failure is the hunter placing the shot poorly.



























