Well, the shotty finally arrived. It's a bit crude, but I am actually VERY impressed with how overbuilt & solid it is and also how much machining the Chinese actually managed to do and keep the price at (reportedly) $100 US wholesale! (They retail about $199 canadian).
The main differences between in and my real Ithacas are:
1) the mag tube is 1 round longer.
2) The screws are all of lower quality with shallow slots.
3) The barrel is locked in by dual opposed locking lugs, while on an original it is held on my interrupted threads. I have no idea if the Chinese design is as durable as the Ithaca design, but I doubt it. Barrel is electropencil serialized to the receiver so I imagine it was at least fitted.
4) Real ithacas have a pivoting cartridge interruptor that cams on the bolt's forwar movement. The Norinco design instead uses a recessed interruptor pushed out of the way by the closing bolt. This was necessary as the Chinese adapted the design from the single action bar of the Ithaca design to a dual action bar setup. I have NO IDEA WHY as the original design worked fine and would have been easier to manufacture...??? It's going to be a challenge to fit an Ithaca forestock to this gun...
5) The Norinco does not slamfire
The good news is a real Ithaca trigger group WILL drop in - YAY! Slamfire here I come! (I have a spare trigger group somewhere in my parts bin, I think...)
6) the receiver markings are prominent and UGLY. I may file them off and discretely re-stamp them somewhere less obvious and then bead and park the gun - we shall see. Depends if this one feeds OK or not.
7) the sights are direct copies of Reminton shotgun rifle sights. OK, but ghost rings would have been better.
8) Threads are exposed once you tighten up the barrel nut. Cosmetically unfortunate, but should be OK.
9) The stock is BUTT UGLY. I'm replacing it anyhow.
More to follow when I get around to it. BUT - overall the gun isn;t as pathetic as I thought it might be from reading the few threads on here about it.
The main differences between in and my real Ithacas are:
1) the mag tube is 1 round longer.
2) The screws are all of lower quality with shallow slots.
3) The barrel is locked in by dual opposed locking lugs, while on an original it is held on my interrupted threads. I have no idea if the Chinese design is as durable as the Ithaca design, but I doubt it. Barrel is electropencil serialized to the receiver so I imagine it was at least fitted.
4) Real ithacas have a pivoting cartridge interruptor that cams on the bolt's forwar movement. The Norinco design instead uses a recessed interruptor pushed out of the way by the closing bolt. This was necessary as the Chinese adapted the design from the single action bar of the Ithaca design to a dual action bar setup. I have NO IDEA WHY as the original design worked fine and would have been easier to manufacture...??? It's going to be a challenge to fit an Ithaca forestock to this gun...
5) The Norinco does not slamfire
6) the receiver markings are prominent and UGLY. I may file them off and discretely re-stamp them somewhere less obvious and then bead and park the gun - we shall see. Depends if this one feeds OK or not.
7) the sights are direct copies of Reminton shotgun rifle sights. OK, but ghost rings would have been better.
8) Threads are exposed once you tighten up the barrel nut. Cosmetically unfortunate, but should be OK.
9) The stock is BUTT UGLY. I'm replacing it anyhow.
More to follow when I get around to it. BUT - overall the gun isn;t as pathetic as I thought it might be from reading the few threads on here about it.


















































