6.5 X 55
I've shot a lot of calibres through a lot of deer and seen more, from .338 Lapua to 25-20WCF. I think the 6.5 does the nicest job.
If you look at military cartridge development today, we're seeing a grouping around the 6.5mm (.264) to 7mm (.284) range...
the 6.5 Grendel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6.5_Grendel
the 6.5 Creedmoor http://www.hornady.com/story.php?s=763
the 6.8 SPC http://www.rifleshootermag.com/ammunition/remington_0303/
The 5.5mm (.223) never really had enough energy, and the NATO and 30-06 were too much, in terms of weight, size, recoil and manufacturing resources. The mid range calibres, especially with the new bullets, deliver the right amount of energy at longer ranges, with excellent accuracy and very good trajectories. The 6.5 Swede started it all.
The Brits tried to build consensus for a reasonable cartridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.280_British
after WW2, but the Americans were too stuck on "their" .308.
The British modelled their cartridge on the ill-fated Canadian .280 Ross and on the highly successful Swedish 6.5. The Americans should have listened.
60 years worth of stubborn later... (and who knows how many dead M16 carrying soldiers)....
PS. I forgot the British exposure to the Japanese Arisaka during WW1 (6.5 X 50).. the Japanese rifles purchased by Britain all found their way to Russia through the Lend-Lease program and the cartridge ended up in use in the first auto invented...
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as86-e.htm
I've shot a lot of calibres through a lot of deer and seen more, from .338 Lapua to 25-20WCF. I think the 6.5 does the nicest job.
If you look at military cartridge development today, we're seeing a grouping around the 6.5mm (.264) to 7mm (.284) range...
the 6.5 Grendel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6.5_Grendel
the 6.5 Creedmoor http://www.hornady.com/story.php?s=763
the 6.8 SPC http://www.rifleshootermag.com/ammunition/remington_0303/
The 5.5mm (.223) never really had enough energy, and the NATO and 30-06 were too much, in terms of weight, size, recoil and manufacturing resources. The mid range calibres, especially with the new bullets, deliver the right amount of energy at longer ranges, with excellent accuracy and very good trajectories. The 6.5 Swede started it all.
The Brits tried to build consensus for a reasonable cartridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.280_British
after WW2, but the Americans were too stuck on "their" .308.
The British modelled their cartridge on the ill-fated Canadian .280 Ross and on the highly successful Swedish 6.5. The Americans should have listened.
60 years worth of stubborn later... (and who knows how many dead M16 carrying soldiers)....
PS. I forgot the British exposure to the Japanese Arisaka during WW1 (6.5 X 50).. the Japanese rifles purchased by Britain all found their way to Russia through the Lend-Lease program and the cartridge ended up in use in the first auto invented...
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as86-e.htm
Last edited:





























)






















